circumcision... question for the girls

[crushmytesticles]

Hey girls, I know its kinda of topic, but do u have any preference on cut or uncut penises, if so why??

[Julie18nz]

Hey girls, I know its kinda of topic, but do u have any preference on cut or uncut penises, if so why??

HAS to be uncut. I am NOT into body mutilation in ANY form

[Trouble]

HAS to be uncut. I am NOT into body mutilation in ANY form
Grabs Julie, puts her up on his shoulders, marches around town playing the trumpet and passing out "I WUV JULIE" bumper stickers.

[ridgel1n9]

Grabs Julie, puts her up on his shoulders, marches around town playing the trumpet and passing out "I WUV JULIE" bumper stickers.

Applauds, and discovers he has to do slightly more than this to meet the minimum posting length. Yay Julie!

[myeiestem]

Looks like she prefer the foreskin off

[evilgrl]

Hey girls, I know its kinda of topic, but do u have any preference on cut or uncut penises, if so why??

I prefer cut. I think it looks better. It could be though that most I've seen have been cut ones. I remember the first time I dated a guy that wasn't cut, when I saw it I was like OMG what happened to it!!!!

evilgrl

[Julie18nz]

The main problem I have with male mutilation, and call it what you will, that is what it TRUELY is, is that there is no need what so ever for it to be done, other than make Doctors rich. I think that is why it is dieing out world wide, but is still done to a great degree in the US. It s free procedure in most other countries, so Doctors don’t drum up false needs for it to be done. Cutting a male is like cutting out the first 3 to 5cm out of a female’s vagina i.e.: some of the most sensitive skin on the human body.

Some cultures use to circumcise woman as well, but for some odd reason that was seen as barbaric, where mutilating male babies was not. One of the world’s biggest double standards. Oh and don’t try quoting the bible to me unless you’re Jewish as in the New Testament it states that it should no longer be done and WASNT done until the mid 18th Century as a way to stop boys from masturbating as it is very uncomfortable for a mutilated male to masturbate were an non-mutilated male finds in quite fun.

I have talked to men who were mutilated as adults, mainly to appease their wives, and all of them have regretted doing it.

I hope that one day soon, people will stop living in the 18th century and STOP mutilating people without there consent :)

Sorry to keep harping on about this, but I find in an abhorrent practice that should be banned and even thinking of when male babies are put through makes me want to vomit.

[crushmytesticles]

hey julie im totally in agreement with you, its a totaly unnecesary procedure, i mean nature put it there for a reason, its a shame that alot of young boys be cut, (mostly in the US) since no other country in the western world do it if it is not requiered for medical reasons

[Kick me UK]

hey julie im totally in agreement with you, its a totaly unnecesary procedure, i mean nature put it there for a reason, its a shame that alot of young boys be cut, (mostly in the US) since no other country in the western world do it if it is not requiered for medical reasons

I do agree that having it done isn't right in most cases, but what if it is done for medical reasons?

Myself, and at least 3 of my friends were circumcised for medical reasons. This is because the foreskin can be so tight, that it cannot be pulled back. This makes cleaning impossible, and makes having an erection very painful. It can also making your piss spray uncontrollably. For these reasons, it was the best thing that happend to me. All my girlfriends and current wife tells me it's also cleaner and they prefer it.

[ridgel1n9]

I do agree that having it done isn't right in most cases, but what if it is done for medical reasons?

Myself, and at least 3 of my friends were circumcised for medical reasons. This is because the foreskin can be so tight, that it cannot be pulled back. This makes cleaning impossible, and makes having an erection very painful. It can also making your piss spray uncontrollably. For these reasons, it was the best thing that happend to me. All my girlfriends and current wife tells me it's also cleaner and they prefer it.

As per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phimosis, there are several solutions for phimosis if in fact you have non-infant phimosis. Infant phimosis being a perfectly normal condition and is used as a justification for circumcision only by incompetent (or manipulative) doctors. Male circumcision is almost exclusively a matter of (IMO barbaric) social reasons, not medical. If your doctor tells you your male child "needs" one, beware they are probably wrong and you should probably find a less incompetent one. To spell it out: pre-puberty, it is NORMAL for the foreskin not to retract and ******* it (like many incompetent doctors try to do) causes harm and is completely unncessary.

[slappyboy45]

I've herd and read the idea that the foreskin is an uneeded vestage from human evolution, and that because we don't run around naked and have our penises assulted by debrie in the forest, we don't need foreskin anymore. By that logic, we don't need half the parts on our bodies. No wonder our country won't let go of circumcision, it was founded by the most repressed and prudish people from Europe.

I am uncircumcized, and proud of it!
Like many other men I was curious about it, having seen it on every porn actor I saw, and began reserching it and was discusted by what I learned.

http://www.cirp.org/

[Julie18nz]

I've herd and read the idea that the foreskin is an uneeded vestage from human evolution, and that because we don't run around naked and have our penises assulted by debrie in the forest, we don't need foreskin anymore. By that logic, we don't need half the parts on our bodies. No wonder our country won't let go of circumcision, it was founded by the most repressed and prudish people from Europe.

I am uncircumcized, and proud of it!
Like many other men I was curious about it, having seen it on every porn actor I saw, and began reserching it and was discusted by what I learned.

http://www.cirp.org/

VERY interesting site. Some very good reading, tho a few bits did make me vomit and I mean REALY made me vomit. I am even MORE againt more against male mutilation than I was before :(

[vulneraballs]

Hey guys - just want to through my 2 cents in on this. First of all, I need to let you know that I am Catholic and circumcised. With regards to religious background, my understanding is that the Catholic and Jewish faiths share the covenant with God to circumcise their males. I can't explain anything more than that other than God said so. So from I can tell, that got things going thousands of years ago for better or worse. The modern day defense is that it is more hygienic and easier to keep the penis clean mitigating a number of health issues.

In the thread, I'm seeing blanket statements about Dr's which I'm not sure I can agree with ... "make them rich", "drum up false needs", "manipulate", "many incompetent". I mean come on!!! I'm sure we can find some bad doctors out there, but lets give them a little credit. I think they’ve earned that. They are generally the most intelligent people in our society and most of them have dedicated their lives to our health.

The evidence (for reasons not to circumcise) is emotionally charged. If the nature of a homicide and it is too brutal, pictures are suppressed because it will bias the jury and cause them to find someone / anyone guilty when they can. While the cited accidents are tragic, you still need to look at how often and where it is coming from ... some of that was tracing back to early 1900's as well as 3rd world countries. I don't want make light of these stories, but they are in the minority - not that that would justify circumcisions, but this isn't a 1 in 10 type of situation. Also, you need to consider the benefits to have them as well. The site touches on them, but there seems to be an agenda in mind against circumcisions.

So I'm saying that I only have a cursory knowledge on the subject but I also think that of everyone else who posted is no less cursory as well. Maybe going to a website that justifies the answers you're looking for might make you feel like you know the whole story, but with the emotionally charged stances, I find it hard to believe that you are being critical

Honestly, I can say that I will NOT blindly have my son circumcised if / when I have a son (I have a daughter now). There seem to be many good reasons to not get it done, but I just think you need to look at this objectively and look for reasons to do it as well.

…

I think the initial point of the thread was if women aesthetically preferred to circumcise VS not-circumcised … so maybe we can get back to that =)

[Julie18nz]

What I am trying to say in most of my posts is that if a person feels the need to get mutlited, then fine, when they, themselves are old enough to have it done, then let them do it, but lets stop rutinely mutilating male babies, just 'because' The hygene excuse flew out the window when they invented soap and we all got indoor plumbing I think :) adn PLEASE dont get me started on the religious issuses :)

As far as looks are concerned, a mutilated penis looks revolting to me :)

[benderboy]

Okay, first let me cringe a couple times before I go on. Here's the bad news for those who think they're following some higher religious dictate when it comes to being circumcised. Yes, many religions have a long tradition of circumcision, but it is not at all like the type used in medical procedures of today. In biblical times the procedure involved pulling the foreskin over the head of the penis and slicing off whatever extended over the head. In some cases that was very little, and the result (in later life) was hardly noticable. You can see the effect of this procedure on many nude male statues from the Renaissance period, including the Statue of David, which appears to have its foreskin intact, but is a representation of the circumcised King David.

The modern practice of removing the foreskin by cutting it at its base around the shaft of the penis does indeed seem to be a product of the medical industry and goes back a couple hundred years. Do doctors relish the idea of delivering male babies so they can collect the extra $250 or so they get from clipping off their foreskins? Well, you may want to consider the attitude of the doctor responsible, who may be thinking: "Hey, if it was good enough for me, it's good enough for him".

At any rate, I think adults shouldn't be making that decision for a infant who may develop a different idea about whether he wants a foreskin when he becomes old enough to understand what's going on.

[cutponies]

And after all, it's just skin. It's not like we're cutting off the glans. Female circumcision is another matter entirely, where sensitive tissue is removed (labia, clitoris).

Besides, when a man erects, the skin should pull completely back anyway, so at the time of it's most important function the circumised and uncircumcised penis are in the same "state".

[testes]

And after all, it's just skin. It's not like we're cutting off the glans. Female circumcision is another matter entirely, where sensitive tissue is removed (labia, clitoris).

Besides, when a man erects, the skin should pull completely back anyway, so at the time of it's most important function the circumised and uncircumcised penis are in the same "state".
that's not true.
when I'm erect my foreskin stil covers half my glans(i have a thicker than average penis and my foreskin isn't too tight , it's all in perfect state).
and I can pull it back behind the corona where it stays when erect.
there is no justification for cutting foreskins away.or you must like the fact that the most sensitive part of your penisskin gets lost.
and for the woman who think acut penis looks better.
it is all what you are used too.
I don't think cut breasts/vaginas look better.I know better.and think better.
I hope y'all do too.

[bouncingballs]

In the thread, I'm seeing blanket statements about Dr's which I'm not sure I can agree with ... "make them rich", "drum up false needs", "manipulate", "many incompetent". I mean come on!!! I'm sure we can find some bad doctors out there, but lets give them a little credit. I think they’ve earned that. They are generally the most intelligent people in our society and most of them have dedicated their lives to our health.

=)

Actually I don't think the greed part is that far off. A bit over a year ago I was experiencing the symptoms of Phimosis. Went to a urologist and was told the only way to solve the problem was circumcision. Well I tried some of the alternatives with full success. If the doc was so knowledgeable he should have known about possible alternative and not been jumping at the chance to start cutting, and collecting money.

[testes]

Actually I don't think the greed part is that far off. A bit over a year ago I was experiencing the symptoms of Phimosis. Went to a urologist and was told the only way to solve the problem was circumcision. Well I tried some of the alternatives with full success. If the doc was so knowledgeable he should have known about possible alternative and not been jumping at the chance to start cutting, and collecting money.
I don't think the medical world is so nice and shiney as many people think it is.
my 'knob'for example ,shines a lot more :eek:
:bananad:

[SavoirFaire]

My 2 cents on the evolving subject:

I've heard some circumcised/uncircumcised guys wanting to CHANGE their status by stretching/cutting skin when ADULTS. When not for medical reasons, this is usually because there's a babe on the other end of such a weird idea... so don't be stupid, you only got ONE penis and there are BILLIONS of babes out there..., so looks like the smart choice is obvious.

BTW, Im circumcised, Im not jewish or even religious, as far as I know my penis has been like this since I can remember, that is, I don't remember being circumcised at all, never had absolutely any problem at all either, there might be a point in the sensitiveness aproach..., works for me too, premature ejaculation is not my dictionary.

Cheers!![/URL][URL="http://femaledom.com/forum/"] (http://femaledom.com/forum/)

[Andrew81]

I had it done when i was about 17. I was told by my doctor it was the only option, if i knew about the alternatives then i would have definitely tried them first. This thread is the first i've heard of them.

I don't regret having it done i think i maybe prefer how it is now. It anoys me that i was never told the other options though.

Babbies and kids defintely shouldn't have to go through it.

[Julie18nz]

My 2 cents on the evolving subject:

I've heard some circumcised/uncircumcised guys wanting to CHANGE their status by stretching/cutting skin when ADULTS. When not for medical reasons, this is usually because there's a babe on the other end of such a weird idea... so don't be stupid, you only got ONE penis and there are BILLIONS of babes out there..., so looks like the smart choice is obvious.

BTW, Im circumcised, Im not jewish or even religious, as far as I know my penis has been like this since I can remember, that is, I don't remember being circumcised at all, never had absolutely any problem at all either, there might be a point in the sensitiveness aproach..., works for me too, premature ejaculation is not my dictionary.

Cheers!![/URL][URL="http://femaledom.com/forum/"] (http://femaledom.com/forum/)

My bf doesnt have premature ejaculations either, and hes not mutilated. So, unmutilted does not mean u prematurely ejaculate, but I will say that he seems to enjoy sex a WHOLE lot more than my last bf who WAS mutilated and if hes having a better time, then so do I :bananad:

[testiclats]

HAS to be uncut. I am NOT into body mutilation in ANY form

I agree with your position against circumcision but some of us were mutilated as babies and we can't do anything about it now, it wasn't our faults... I hate to think some women would discriminate against me because of something that was done to me as a baby. So, don't take it out on the victims...

[Julie18nz]

I agree with your position against circumcision but some of us were mutilated as babies and we can't do anything about it now, it wasn't our faults... I hate to think some women would discriminate against me because of something that was done to me as a baby. So, don't take it out on the victims...

I dont and I honestly dont think any woman would. As u say, u had no choice, but on the other hand there ARE women that refuse point blankly to go with a guy that wasnt mutilated at birth and they are even made fun off on international TV shows, such as Sex in the City. I would say that far more unmutilted guys surffer from ignorant prejudice than mutilated ones do:)

[testes]

I dont and I honestly dont think any woman would. As u say, u had no choice, but on the other hand there ARE women that refuse point blankly to go with a guy that wasnt mutilated at birth and they are even made fun off on international TV shows, such as Sex in the City. I would say that far more unmutilted guys surffer from ignorant prejudice than mutilated ones do:)
yes ,it hurts to see people acting as if they are funny while in fact they are being rude and ignorant.
would they like it when men would have such ordeals about their vaginas?
like somalien men do.they don't want women wo still have their clitoris.
the women on sex and the city are at the same 'smart'level as these men.
THAT fact they should know.
now only to get this information into their small brains...
can't watch that program anyway it is full of other crap too.but a lot of women do watch it.I'm aware of that sad fact.
but in europe most men have foreskins.

and having a foreskin means that the glans is more sensitive(no callous skin) and isn't this wat's allbout here.to hurt a man's cock and balls.;-)

tasticlats..if a woman is finding your 'cut' penis a problem.then try finding a woman who respects you for who you are,and not judges you on your penis being cut or not.that is plain ridiculous.
it is like saying to a woman,'your tits are too small,you are a nice person but I can't live with small tits'.
how more stupid can someone be than that(uhm the women in sex and the city maybe?)

[SavoirFaire]

....
it is like saying to a woman,'your tits are too small,you are a nice person but I can't live with small tits'.
how more stupid can someone be than that(uhm the women in sex and the city maybe?)
hahahahaha.... as simple as that, or a piercing in wherever part.
I guess some of the girls made their points on naturism..., but lets not forget this is a pervert's forum :wooow

[testes]

hahahahaha.... as simple as that, or a piercing in wherever part.
I guess some of the girls made their points on naturism..., but lets not forget this is a pervert's forum :wooow
oh yes,
but being 'a bit' perverted, doesn't mean we are hypocrites.or mean.
aside from our fetish ofcourse :D
hehe

[Trouble]

And after all, it's just skin. It's not like we're cutting off the glans. Female circumcision is another matter entirely, where sensitive tissue is removed (labia, clitoris).

Besides, when a man erects, the skin should pull completely back anyway, so at the time of it's most important function the circumised and uncircumcised penis are in the same "state".
Part of the function of the foreskin is that it pushes the lubricants naturally released by homo sapiens doin' the Homo Sapien Thang back up into the vagina; when the foreskin is removed, the lubricants generated by the people doin' it tends to dribble out the chick; hence, the need for artificial lube to be added.

Yes; circumcision must have been created by the Lube Industry!!! Okay, maybe not quite, but the foreskin has a LOT more purpose than being just skin.

In the 1700's, almost no male in America was circumcised. It SHOULD BE illegal unless there is medical cause. Nearly all cases demanding neonatal incision (the operation you so DO NOT want to know anything more about) have to be done on circumcised boys.

[testes]

Part of the function of the foreskin is that it pushes the lubricants naturally released by homo sapiens doin' the Homo Sapien Thang back up into the vagina; when the foreskin is removed, the lubricants generated by the people doin' it tends to dribble out the chick; hence, the need for artificial lube to be added.

Yes; circumcision must have been created by the Lube Industry!!! Okay, maybe not quite, but the foreskin has a LOT more purpose than being just skin.

In the 1700's, almost no male in America was circumcised. It SHOULD BE illegal unless there is medical cause. Nearly all cases demanding neonatal incision (the operation you so DO NOT want to know anything more about) have to be done on circumcised boys.
exactly !
as if it is totally safe doing a circumcision.there are many cases where things go wrong.
but the main objective to it, is that the foreskin has more functions.and it is a sensitive skin.you decentisize the cock when cutting the foreskin off.
because that is what is happening when you cut 1/third of the penis-skin off.
doesn't sound healthy or normal does it?does make me think of those dogs who have their tail cut off because the owner think 'it looks better'.

[circ_fetisher]

Looks like she prefer the foreskin off

hehe excellent photo:jumpsmile

[John Roberts]

I've heard that with the foreskin in place there is little friction at the opening of the vagina because the penis slides back and forth within the extra skin. because there is less friction there is less need for lubrication, which would only be needed for entering. it also makes the head of the penis more sensitive since it is not constantly exposed.

[Tanya]

Hey girls, I know its kinda of topic, but do u have any preference on cut or uncut penises, if so why??

As for preference – It is all a matter of what we get used to. My preference was first for cut cocks because that was the first I saw, that’s what a cock was and what it was supposed to look like. But we learn to like a very wide range of things if we keep an open mind, just like we learn to eat a wide variety of things (infants are only programmed for milk, all other food preferences are leaned). Then I met my first un-cut cock, it was a shock at first, but having an open mind I soon learned to love un-cut cocks. An un-cut cock is sort of like a birthday present – you may have to open it to see the goodie! But it is always in there somewhere waiting for you, you may have to entice it to peek out but it will usually poke out! Well, now I am richer for it because loving both kinds of cocks makes my world bigger, more varied, more interesting, and there is no disappointment because of, or lack of, a little bit of skin. Both cock styles seem to work the same way.

As for sexual performance – If clipping a penis makes it less sensitive then perhaps that is a good thing. I know several guys that need more staying power – perhaps they need to be clipped? No, that would not always be the solution because I also know some guys that have been clipped that also need more staying power.

As for medical – OK if really necessary, but most seem to be medically unnecessary according to my searches. So no doubt there is greed involved in at least some of the snipping. Ignorance, custom, culture, religion, etc in the rest.

As for infant circumcision – Should not be done without the infant’s request & agreement. Let him grow to adult and learn how it works, try it out, see how it feels, observe the sensitivity of it, learn how often he has to masturbate, know the feel of sticking it in pussy – then if he wants his penis trimmed let him go for it

As for custom & culture – Monkey see monkey do

As for prudery & ignorance – One mother told me a nurse told her unless she got her boy circumcised she would have to clean her boy’s penis every day until he was old enough to clean it himself or else he would get infected penis and maybe have to have it cut off. How terrible!

As for religious reasons – I cannot believe an all powerful God would give a rat’s *** about a little bit of skin. Sounds more like man’s invention. Just more $ for rabbi, imam, & anyone else that preaches it.

As for penis sensitivity – I have often wondered about that ever since I saw my first un-cut cock. Since then I always ask the penises and penis owners about which is more sensitive – cut or un-cut? Of course, how could a man know unless he was cut as an adult? Sounds like a wonderfully fun scientific experiment – any volunteers? We would need hundreds of un-cut men that are willing to be snipped – no virgins allowed. Anyway, being unwilling to listen to wild, uneducated guesses and assumptions I searched the net for scientific research. Lo and behold there is lots of studies – must be fun jobs that. I have posted one here with the URL but there are many others. Of course, other studies show the opposite.


Study: Circumcision Removes Most Sensitive Parts
By Ker Than, LiveScience Staff Writer
posted: 15 June 2007 12:53 pm ET

How much does circumcision alter what a man ultimately feels? Scientific studies aiming to answer this question have been inconclusive.

Now researchers prodding dozens of male penises with a fine-tipped tool have found that the five areas most receptive to fine-touch are routinely removed by the surgery.

The finding, announced today, was detailed in the April issue of the British Journal of Urology (BJU) International.

Circumcision surgery involves the removal of the skin that covers the tip of the penis, called the foreskin. Infant male circumcision is the most common medical procedure in the United States, with an estimated 60 percent of male newborns undergoing the surgery.

Morris Sorrells of National Organization of Circumcision Information Resources Center and colleagues created a “penile sensitivity map” by measuring the sensitivity of 19 locations on the penises of 159 male volunteers. Of the participants, 91 were circumcised as infants and none had histories of penile or sexual dysfunction.

For circumcised penises, the most sensitive region was the circumcision scar on the underside of the penis, the researchers found. For uncircumcised penises, the areas most receptive to pressure were five regions normally removed during circumcision—all of which were more sensitive than the most sensitive part of the circumcised penis.

Circumcision is a procedure practiced in several countries for medical as well as cultural reasons. Most scientists agree that the surgery confers some protection against infection and the risk of contracting sexual diseases. Recent studies have also shown that circumcision can lower the risks of HIV infection by as much as 60 percent in sex between males and females.

But Robert Van Howe, a study team member at Michigan State University, thinks such claims are somewhat overblown. “The [health benefits] that have been consistently shown are very small, and there are less aggressive, less invasive, less expensive ways of dealing with the problems [circumcision] is supposed to address,” Van Howe told LiveScience.

Other practices, such as choosing sexual partners wisely and using condoms consistently, are far more effective in protecting against diseases, he added.

Circumcision is opposed by some groups on the grounds that it is painful and not a life-saving procedure, and that it also makes sex less pleasurable by exposing and numbing the tip of the penis, called the glans. Some have gone so far as recommending foreskin restoration.

Some previous studies found that circumcision led to little, if any, decrease in penile sensitivity, but Sorrells and his colleagues say such findings are suspect because many are based on self-reports from men who were circumcised to correct medical problems.

http://www.livescience.com/health/070615_penis_sensitivity.html

[smallgenitals]

I'm glad I'm uncut. It makes masturbating and sex feel a lot better, I heard.

[darkwing]

Many interesting posts.

As noted, circumcision does not necesarily remove the foreskin entirely. When I'm not hard, I have enough left to cover the glans entrely. It keeps the irritation down when wearing pants and walking about. When erect, it's slid all the way back. And I don't recall being circumcised when I was younger at all, though my mother remembers, and doesn't mind bringing up the old stories at sometimes embarrassing times.

While an intact foreskin may push fluids forward, I've read where studies have been done (someone had some interesting ideas they wanted to study) that showed that the shape of the swollen glans (with the coronal ridge and all) seemed to have the effect of a scoop to remove fluids from deep in the vagina (like a predecessor's semen). You know, I think I saw some ear wax cleaners in Japan that had a shape like that on their ends.;)

Anyways, as has been said before, it's not so much what you have, but what you do with it. That's more likely how we'll be judged at the last judgement.:o

[comedyst]

Hey guys, do you know circumcision scene from any movie?(Threating by a girl :D).I've fetish of it.I know two movie.Mustang Sally's Horror House, Meet Weed America.If you guys know more please share with us.

Thanks..

[Rebecca]

In my country, most guys my age (and older) are circumcised. As it is no longer covered by the universal health care, some parents are opting not to do it these days, though some are still under the misconception that it's a healthy thing to do.

I don't really care if the guy is circed or not, but I am opposed to infant circumcision.

[WingsOfLiberty]

The main problem I have with male mutilation, and call it what you will, that is what it TRUELY is, is that there is no need what so ever for it to be done, other than make Doctors rich. I think that is why it is dieing out world wide, but is still done to a great degree in the US. It s free procedure in most other countries, so Doctors don’t drum up false needs for it to be done. Cutting a male is like cutting out the first 3 to 5cm out of a female’s vagina i.e.: some of the most sensitive skin on the human body.

Some cultures use to circumcise woman as well, but for some odd reason that was seen as barbaric, where mutilating male babies was not. One of the world’s biggest double standards. Oh and don’t try quoting the bible to me unless you’re Jewish as in the New Testament it states that it should no longer be done and WASNT done until the mid 18th Century as a way to stop boys from masturbating as it is very uncomfortable for a mutilated male to masturbate were an non-mutilated male finds in quite fun.

I have talked to men who were mutilated as adults, mainly to appease their wives, and all of them have regretted doing it.

I hope that one day soon, people will stop living in the 18th century and STOP mutilating people without there consent :)

Sorry to keep harping on about this, but I find in an abhorrent practice that should be banned and even thinking of when male babies are put through makes me want to vomit.


completely in agreement here. Julie18nz don't know if ur still around but reading that just made you one of the most liked person here lol, btw, sry for bringing back up old stuff ^_^ all good tho.

Men and Women don't need to change anything about themselves, natural is perfect whether ur big or small, black or white, everyone is beautiful and unique. .... the extra fun ones tho... are kinky lol :)

[Selftailer]

As for sexual performance – If clipping a penis makes it less sensitive then perhaps that is a good thing. I know several guys that need more staying power – perhaps they need to be clipped? No, that would not always be the solution because I also know some guys that have been clipped that also need more staying power.



It may be, but once, I have been asked from a Mistress to be clipped in order to give a better sexual performance. I didn't do it, but we both enjoyed about this fantasy. It was really cool. :bananajum