PDA

View Full Version : Thoughts on nut size when kicking / kneeing



teapot42
11-07-2006, 03:22 PM
I've seen a few posts debating whether you are better off having big or small nuts when being kicked or kneed in the balls. I've got big nuts myself and find that kicking and kneeing often doesn't work well.

My main thought is that while it is easier to *hit* large nuts, it is harder to actually squash them against anything. They are more likely to get protection from the thighs and even if you do hit them, they are more likely to roll away and only take some of the hit.

Small nuts, however, are easier to get caught between the striking object and the pubic bone, and with a proportionally larger area hitting them, are more likely to get trapped and crushed.

The other thought is that with smaller balls, the chances of trapping and crushing both is higher than with larger ones. The only thing there is that I find that having one crushed can be more painful than having both crushed - somehow the pain cancels out a bit. Does anyone else experience that?

tonyr
11-12-2006, 06:39 AM
Utter and total and absolute CODSWALLOP!!!
Pubic Bone Syndrome strikes once again.
Away with you. TossPot84 ;)


I've seen a few posts debating whether you are better off having big or small nuts when being kicked or kneed in the balls. I've got big nuts myself and find that kicking and kneeing often doesn't work well.

My main thought is that while it is easier to *hit* large nuts, it is harder to actually squash them against anything. They are more likely to get protection from the thighs and even if you do hit them, they are more likely to roll away and only take some of the hit.

Small nuts, however, are easier to get caught between the striking object and the pubic bone, and with a proportionally larger area hitting them, are more likely to get trapped and crushed.

The other thought is that with smaller balls, the chances of trapping and crushing both is higher than with larger ones. The only thing there is that I find that having one crushed can be more painful than having both crushed - somehow the pain cancels out a bit. Does anyone else experience that?

angst
11-12-2006, 11:04 PM
i have no idea about smaller balls, since i only have the one pair i was born with...

i tend to think they are rather large, and i like it that way...

for me, the thrill of being busted is in the moments before the foot/knee/fist finds my balls...

a real adrenaline rush. and i find that, because i have larger balls, they take a bit more abuse, perhaps...

if you're interested in making them an easier target, http://www.sincentral.co.uk/ sells an AWESOME single piece or split ball weight (your choice)

shipping is reasonable, and the price is right... i /love/ mine...

Mako
11-16-2006, 09:30 AM
I've seen a few posts debating whether you are better off having big or small nuts when being kicked or kneed in the balls. I've got big nuts myself and find that kicking and kneeing often doesn't work well.

My main thought is that while it is easier to *hit* large nuts, it is harder to actually squash them against anything. They are more likely to get protection from the thighs and even if you do hit them, they are more likely to roll away and only take some of the hit.

Small nuts, however, are easier to get caught between the striking object and the pubic bone, and with a proportionally larger area hitting them, are more likely to get trapped and crushed.

The other thought is that with smaller balls, the chances of trapping and crushing both is higher than with larger ones. The only thing there is that I find that having one crushed can be more painful than having both crushed - somehow the pain cancels out a bit. Does anyone else experience that?

Large balls are definitely better, they can take more hits and are less likely to be crushed.

tonyr
11-16-2006, 08:54 PM
i would have thought that one's tollerance to the sensation was the only deciding factor. The greater the length of the scrotum is the more isolation of the testicles from the body and thus the greater the access for crushing and stomping with the balls on the floor for example. As for the pelvic bone, it is worthwhile remebering that it will not give before the testicles. If pelvic bone/testicle action is what someone wants, then it requires kicks with a great deal of intended and actual follow through. From a crush or stomp perspective, the scrotum contracted and thus the balls positioned close to the body is a nearer ideal situation. The Pubic/Pelvic Bone Syndrome as I often term/mock it, is a very dangerous scenario, with a skilled, yet alone, unskilled Deliverer. This type of ballbusting requires consistency and very good control. A centimetre's difference is what could be the difference between a crap kick and one of both balls suffering serious damage. Much of this Pelvic bone stuff is fantasy, there's much more safety, even at hard contacts, whilst not going towards the fine line end of ballbusting, such as this end of it. Also consider potential damage to other local areas due to heavy kicks. One could have balls a big as one's head. That may make them a more visible target, but it says nothing about the tollerance to the sensations generated from a kick. Small testicles may be a lesser target to hit accurately or less consistently, but most women would soon hit the spot. Ballbusting is a staged thing. The guys want to be busted, hence there is a making one's self accessible to be busted. Size means very little. A preference or desire, but ultimately nothing.


Large balls are definitely better, they can take more hits and are less likely to be crushed.

coolnamehere
11-17-2006, 02:55 AM
I've seen a few posts debating whether you are better off having big or small nuts when being kicked or kneed in the balls. I've got big nuts myself and find that kicking and kneeing often doesn't work well.

My main thought is that while it is easier to *hit* large nuts, it is harder to actually squash them against anything. They are more likely to get protection from the thighs and even if you do hit them, they are more likely to roll away and only take some of the hit.

Small nuts, however, are easier to get caught between the striking object and the pubic bone, and with a proportionally larger area hitting them, are more likely to get trapped and crushed.

The other thought is that with smaller balls, the chances of trapping and crushing both is higher than with larger ones. The only thing there is that I find that having one crushed can be more painful than having both crushed - somehow the pain cancels out a bit. Does anyone else experience that?
I don't know about that, I have big balls and one shot takes me out for a few minutes.

teapot42
11-22-2006, 05:42 PM
I don't know about that, I have big balls and one shot takes me out for a few minutes.


Oh, yes, one shot will take me down *when it actually crushes them*. My GF can kick or knee them for ages with me trying different positions before she actually connects. If she just tries slamming her knee in to my sac the chances of me even feeling it are slim - I have to adopt the most stupid position with my legs spread and half squatting before she can get them. I wish I knew a way around this as she's keen to crush them but just can't find an easy way to do so.

(She's great at squeezing and punching, but I'd love the occasional good knee)

teapot42
11-22-2006, 05:47 PM
Utter and total and absolute CODSWALLOP!!!
Pubic Bone Syndrome strikes once again.
Away with you. TossPot84 ;)

:)

Seriously, though, I do wonder if there is anything to nut size affecting how much it hurts and how likely you are to get a painful hit. My nuts have been measured to well above average size (about 36cc while average is 16-25) and kicks and knees very rarely get a good contact on them. I rarely even feel most of the hits so it's not to do with pain tolerance...

tonyr
11-22-2006, 08:33 PM
:D :D :D

Don't worry geezer, I know quite a few Ballbustresses that would drop you to the floor, whether you nads were the size of a world cup football or an apple's pip.

Now are these balls of yours real?:D

It's great that you've got a high tollerance but take my word for it, you've just not yet come across the Lady that will wimperize you yet.
Are you up for a shoot in the new year?


:)

Seriously, though, I do wonder if there is anything to nut size affecting how much it hurts and how likely you are to get a painful hit. My nuts have been measured to well above average size (about 36cc while average is 16-25) and kicks and knees very rarely get a good contact on them. I rarely even feel most of the hits so it's not to do with pain tolerance...

poolman2
11-23-2006, 12:22 AM
Teapot42,

Hi!

You've piqued my curiosity? How did you measure the size of your balls.

Not being overly scientifically minded, the best method I could think of to easily measure the boys is to immerse them in a container of water, and then determine how much water they displaced. Somehow neither I nor my scientist wife have ever been that curious.

Incidentally, the cubic root of the 36 cc measurement of your testicles is 3.3. Thus if your measurements are correct, your balls are about the size of a cube which 3.3cc or 1 1/3 in. on a side. Hmmm...maybe people in your area just need a little more nourishment. LOL

poolman2

tonyr
11-23-2006, 06:57 AM
:Baahaha: :Baahaha: :Baahaha: :D :D :D ;)
Bro Poolman, perhaps it is time for you to re-title yourself as Bro Einstein Gonadus.
We both respect the dude for trying to make a point but.....
The last thing on my mind when some hot ballbustress is putting distress on my nuts is the size of 'em. Its like saying a ballbustress with bigfeet will do more damage or have a greater impact and thus effect. Ballbustresses with small feet can wreak havoc on a dude with nads the size of a Grid Iron ball and equally can wreak havoc on a guy with small balls. It ain't got fuck all to do with size. Its all about the skill of the ballbustress. I've come across ladies so statuesque and powerfully built I feared them even looking at my nuts. Two hours later, and I'm still wondering when the session was going to start in earnest. Then I've been in sessions with a lady that looked so ineffective and fragile and low and behold, the first kick drops me like a sack of potatoes and the whole session is a repeat of the first kick.
The dude will eventually come across the ballbustress that will
WIMPERIZE him big BIG TIME!!!.


Teapot42,

Hi!

You've piqued my curiosity? How did you measure the size of your balls.

Not being overly scientifically minded, the best method I could think of to easily measure the boys is to immerse them in a container of water, and then determine how much water they displaced. Somehow neither I nor my scientist wife have ever been that curious.

Incidentally, the cubic root of the 36 cc measurement of your testicles is 3.3. Thus if your measurements are correct, your balls are about the size of a cube which 3.3cc or 1 1/3 in. on a side. Hmmm...maybe people in your area just need a little more nourishment. LOL

poolman2

helios
11-23-2006, 07:27 AM
There is a device for measuring testicles, called an orchidometer - 'orchid' because it is from the greek 'orchis' - and it is also where we get the name orchid for the flower: because its root looks like a testicle.

Anyway, it is a string of variously shaped balls, or to be more precise, ovoids, which the doctor then measures against the patient. They each have a 'size' on them - though what measurement they use I dont know - mililitres?!?

I think they are mostly used on children, to monitor that the genitals are developing correctly, though there are adult versions as well.

They're also called Prader balls or beads, after the guy that invented them - some site like wikipedia probably has more information.

helios

poolman2
11-23-2006, 11:15 PM
Bro Tonyr,

Finally some respect. And a grand title no less: "Bro Einstein Gonadus." I'm humbled and thrilled. :bananajum

I'm also in agreement with you: the size of your nuts has nothing to do with the amount of pain you get when your girl busts 'em. It all depends on how she hits them and how hard she does it.

As always, I remain your most humble and obedient servant, :bananawin

poolman2

crushee
11-24-2006, 07:41 AM
I hope Teapot's balls are not cubicles !!!

Assuming they are ellipsoïds (Hope the word exists in English!), the formula giving the volume of an ellipsoïd if its HALF axis are a, b and c is :
V= 4/3 *3,14*a*b*c;
Assuming that the longest axix is 2cm longer than the middle one, and that the middle one is 1cm longer than the smallest one, this leads roughly to the following dimensions:
length: 5,6 cm (2 1/4 in)
width: 3,6 cm (1 1/2 in)
and "thickness": 2,6 cm (1 in).

If we assume the volume has been measured with skin, hair and is probably over estimated, we can say Teapot's balls are sadly in the average, actually probably slightly under the average, BUT CERTAINELY NOT "well over the average".

Of course, each of the dimensions may vary as I have guessed (more or less) "standard" ratio between them. However, this possible variation should remain rather small and would not affect significantly the indicated figures and the conclusion about undernormality of these balls.

tonyr
11-24-2006, 08:51 AM
Arise Sir Poolman2, You have been knighted in recognitions to you'se services in da fields of Dynamic Testicular Volumetric Cross Dimentional Bullshit Detection Bragology.:thumbup

The Dude is missing the point, completely. The size of his balls is not a factor in relation to his sensation thresholds.:confused:
Perhaps he should get his Ballbustress to photograph these mighty orbs and post the image in this thread for The Board of the Institute of Testicular Voumetric Mass Incorporated dot Com PLC (Registered in Drug Money Tax Craven On-Shore Island), to further assess his case.:D :D


Bro Tonyr,

Finally some respect. And a grand title no less: "Bro Einstein Gonadus." I'm humbled and thrilled. :bananajum

I'm also in agreement with you: the size of your nuts has nothing to do with the amount of pain you get when your girl busts 'em. It all depends on how she hits them and how hard she does it.

As always, I remain your most humble and obedient servant, :bananawin

poolman2

tonyr
11-24-2006, 09:22 AM
Thank You for your input Professor Crushee.

The panel now awaits clear photographic evidence of Bro Teapots gonadus before being accepted into our most secret of societies. We, the breathren of The Secret Order of Global Ballbustees, have been enguaged in a most illustrious and under illuminated plot to control all the factors of the world. Our aim of a One World Government, where all men are reduced to being merely goyim and thus perfect for being regularly ballbusted is near to completion. The females of the planet have been prepared to be the Ballbustesses. We have successfully infiltrated all aspects of societies, religions, nightclubs, brothels, financial institutions, media, political institutions, porno outlets and MORE!!!!
Our underlings have been Presidents, Prime Ministers, Film Stars, Captains of Industry, Webmasters and Webmistresses, Pop Stars, Road Sweepers, Nurses, Doctors, Police Officers, even our that most contankirous of Forum members, Trouble, has and is serving 'OUR CAUSE' We are close to covering all the bases and all the pieces on the chess board and the chess board as well. Or is that cheeseboard?
Anyway, once Brother Teapot comes forth with clear photographic evidence, he will take the vows of absolute loyality to the Great Work and Cause of the Forever Sore Giant Gonads. Then as Brethen of the Temple of Absolute Bollocks, we will hold our own nads in our left hand whilst hoping on one leg and chanting, 'Sore Balls will rule the world. Sore Balls will rule the world''.
Then we will microchip all the Females Footwear and places R.F.I.D'.s in the underpants of all Ballbustees. Cash will be erradicated and the only way to get any service or access to any material possession, will be by recieving credits from being racked or racking.
This the greatest of works awaits Bro Teapots42's photographic proof.

Then we will install him as the new head of the U.N. (Unique Nads). Their he will further advocate and impliment policies that lead us to the Nivarna of absolute control via a programmed population fed and maintained via Ballbusting.

Ah, ah, ah, ah ,ah, ah..........:Baahaha: :Baahaha: :Baahaha:


I hope Teapot's balls are not cubicles !!!

Assuming they are ellipsoïds (Hope the word exists in English!), the formula giving the volume of an ellipsoïd if its HALF axis are a, b and c is :
V= 4/3 *3,14*a*b*c;
Assuming that the longest axix is 2cm longer than the middle one, and that the middle one is 1cm longer than the smallest one, this leads roughly to the following dimensions:
length: 5,6 cm (2 1/4 in)
width: 3,6 cm (1 1/2 in)
and "thickness": 2,6 cm (1 in).

If we assume the volume has been measured with skin, hair and is probably over estimated, we can say Teapot's balls are sadly in the average, actually probably slightly under the average, BUT CERTAINELY NOT "well over the average".

Of course, each of the dimensions may vary as I have guessed (more or less) "standard" ratio between them. However, this possible variation should remain rather small and would not affect significantly the indicated figures and the conclusion about undernormality of these balls.

gary198
11-24-2006, 06:42 PM
I hope Teapot's balls are not cubicles !!!

Assuming they are ellipsoïds (Hope the word exists in English!), the formula giving the volume of an ellipsoïd if its HALF axis are a, b and c is :
V= 4/3 *3,14*a*b*c;
Assuming that the longest axix is 2cm longer than the middle one, and that the middle one is 1cm longer than the smallest one, this leads roughly to the following dimensions:
length: 5,6 cm (2 1/4 in)
width: 3,6 cm (1 1/2 in)
and "thickness": 2,6 cm (1 in).

If we assume the volume has been measured with skin, hair and is probably over estimated, we can say Teapot's balls are sadly in the average, actually probably slightly under the average, BUT CERTAINELY NOT "well over the average".

Of course, each of the dimensions may vary as I have guessed (more or less) "standard" ratio between them. However, this possible variation should remain rather small and would not affect significantly the indicated figures and the conclusion about undernormality of these balls.

Didn't you know that the heat of the meat is in direct proportion to the angle of the dangle as long as the mass of the ass remains constant?

Say that fast.

fittizzioh
11-24-2006, 07:09 PM
My former girlfriend adored to chew my balls but they did not fit her mouth easily... maybe this could be another way of measure!

Fehya
11-24-2006, 07:32 PM
Didn't you know that the heat of the meat is in direct proportion to the angle of the dangle as long as the mass of the ass remains constant?

Was told:
The angle of the dangle is inversely proportional to the lust of the thrust providing the urge remains constant.

No wonder I'm doing it wrong.

Trouble
11-25-2006, 02:04 AM
Didn't you know that the heat of the meat is in direct proportion to the angle of the dangle as long as the mass of the ass remains constant?

Was told:
The angle of the dangle is inversely proportional to the lust of the thrust providing the urge remains constant.

No wonder I'm doing it wrong.
Oh, come now, gents, there is nothing wrong about it, you are just describing the math of the tilt when pushing it IN and then the math when puling it BACK; as long as you use the right angle for thrust-IN and yank-BACK, you are doing it right. If you get them reversed, you usually wind up with something anal.

tonyr
11-25-2006, 07:34 AM
You'd need to have a standardised size of willing mouth.;) :D


My former girlfriend adored to chew my balls but they did not fit her mouth easily... maybe this could be another way of measure!

BabyBeca
11-25-2006, 06:11 PM
I find that if a male has a large scrotum that
hangs low it does not alwasy mean large glands inside

his rocks maybe tiny in a large sack and the only way to
tell for sure is to reach in and give each nut a forcful squeese.

If they are to small you can always bind them at the bottom of the
scrotum and then beat them black and blue with a wooden stoop or your own fist. Yet if his balls turn out to be huge then I like to kick them over and over until they swell up, then I make him limp around the room to admire my handy work, smacking one teste or the other to even the two nuts out in size and shape.

hugs to all
BB

tonyr
11-26-2006, 06:23 AM
The size matters but what?

As a supposed Ballbustress, how would you deal with the fact of a bustee with small balls, wanting you to,
'kick them over and over until they swell up, then I make him limp around the room to admire your handy work, smacking one teste or the other to even the two nuts out in size and shape?'
Or, the bustee with large balls that wants you to,
' beat them black and blue with a wooden stoop or your fist?'

The size matters to you on your own personal perspective, you have preferences.
The true making of a Ballbustress is the abbility to deliver ballbusting beyond the Ballbustress' immediate personal preferences. She has to be able to do this with scant regard to the size of the balls and must be able to adjust adapt her art/act of ballbusting to accomodate for the size and immediate locality and enviroment of the balls. And that is ultimately why it does not matter and all the more as the size of the balls bares no relationship to the sensations derived by the bustee/balls owner.


I find that if a male has a large scrotum that
hangs low it does not alwasy mean large glands inside

his rocks maybe tiny in a large sack and the only way to
tell for sure is to reach in and give each nut a forcful squeese.

If they are to small you can always bind them at the bottom of the
scrotum and then beat them black and blue with a wooden stoop or your own fist. Yet if his balls turn out to be huge then I like to kick them over and over until they swell up, then I make him limp around the room to admire my handy work, smacking one teste or the other to even the two nuts out in size and shape.

hugs to all
BB

poolman2
11-27-2006, 07:45 PM
Bro Tonyr, :ibow4u:

Thank you very much for this most gracious honor. I will strive to remain worthy of it. I will conscientiously work to see that we practicioners of the ballbusting arts and sciences maintain scientific rigor and integrity as well as artistic flare and passion.

Apropos of all that, my wife needs to spend some time maintaining her kicking skills and I need to practice my receiving. We've been out of town and haven't been been practicing for a few days, so we can't take any chances on our abilities getting rusty. :thumbup

After we're done, I'll try to get back to you guys when I am able to walk to the computer again. :wooow LOL

poolman2

tonyr
11-28-2006, 07:08 AM
:ibow4u: Dearest Breathren Poolman2 of The Secret Order of Global Ballbustees,

Thank for the fine work you and your most gracious BallBustress undertook for our great Order whilst under the guise of a couple on vacation. Due to the illustrious efforts of you both, the stock of that corporation headquarted in the very city that you visited has plumetted. Also, since your visit, there has been a tenfold increase in the number of reported ballbusts in the same area. The end effect is down your both excellent efforts and pefromances. The Order, in clear recognition of your grape works, (not a spelling mistake), has created a new front for you to both benifity from. This front is, Coporate Boardroom Busts dot Comi. We observed the ruthless and clinicalititty kicks, punches and stomps that your fine BallBustress unleashed and unloaded onto those fools who were messing with our assets. The whole session was filmed with hidden micro cameras and the resulting footage will be re-edited to form the basis of the content for the above named venture.
In particular, I must recall the wonderful sprint and final kick to that most stupid of Chief Executive Officers, I have ever come across. It was a pleasure to see him go into orbit from being on all fours at the opposit end of the the boardroom table that he was squat on. (To think that he was my cousin and I personally recommedend the fool for the position. Alway deep down knew that he couldn't take a a good bust) Anyway, please worry not to the fact that he flew through the unfortunately not toughened glass;) and had a wonderful journey from the fifty second storey. He finally prove profitable as not only was he insured, he also damaged beyond repair, one of the trucks, of a transport operation that we own. Furthermore, as we own all the companies in the buliding and all the other buildings, and all staff that are in the these bulidings, those that were located facing the unfortunate event supposedly suffered mass trauma, and have been off work due to the experience. We thus have claimed insurance for the losses resulting from the loss of employees due to this trauma. We have also claimed for the resulting traffic disruptions and anything else that we can claim for.
I hope that both yourself and your fine Ballbustress, take this time to re-couperate, rest and build up slowly before resuming personal sessions.
I furthermore offer my sympathies as to the fact that she was in such zest and vigour during this mission, that due to the fact that you were wearing a pinstripe suit during the presentation and obliteration of the board of the incumbent corporation, she at one point mistook you for one of the deputy C.F.O.'s. Man can she fire a good kick. Do you always yelp with such leg crossing distress?:o
May I suggest for the future that you wear weejuns, chinos and the discrete blazer of the order, minus the breast pocket emblem of the Omni-Potent Female Foot, squish squashing a pair of nads. Afterall, the coporate attire is in the mode of smart casual nowadays.

Until our Mass Bust Convention in Spring 2007.

Bro TonyR.:thumbup :ibow4u: :Baahaha: :D

P.S: Kindly rid yourself of the black and blue bruises on your nads before the event. Bro Trouble (Main Bustee Contakirous) and Sister Snoodle (Under Empress-Hand Crush) and Sister Julie (Vice Ballbustress Extremey Hardous), have been warned about their conduct at the Autumn Convention 2006. One shudders until this day.:cryingblu ;)


Bro Tonyr, :ibow4u:

Thank you very much for this most gracious honor. I will strive to remain worthy of it. I will conscientiously work to see that we practicioners of the ballbusting arts and sciences maintain scientific rigor and integrity as well as artistic flare and passion.

Apropos of all that, my wife needs to spend some time maintaining her kicking skills and I need to practice my receiving. We've been out of town and haven't been been practicing for a few days, so we can't take any chances on our abilities getting rusty.

After we're done, I'll try to get back to you guys when I am able to walk to the computer again. :wooow LOL

poolman2

teapot42
11-28-2006, 04:43 PM
If we assume the volume has been measured with skin, hair and is probably over estimated, we can say Teapot's balls are sadly in the average, actually probably slightly under the average, BUT CERTAINELY NOT "well over the average".


Well, this thread appears to have gone down hill somewhat! You may be right about the size, but surely an orchidometer must take some account of the thickness of the scrotum - I can't see a doctor slitting it open and lifting your nuts out just to measure them! I must admit my measurements were crude - if you search for it, there is a printable orchidometer available online. If you check the scale carefully you can get it print out nut-sized templates to measure your eggs against. Mine came in well above the largest on there so I did a bit of interpolation and came up with the rough figure for size. I have been told (by a woman with extensive testicular experience and a vice-like grip) that they are the largest she has come across but until they are measured accurately I will agree to only describe them as on the large side of normal.

All this, however, does not help at all with advice on how to ensure any kicks and knees my GF directs in their general direction have the desired effect of crushing them painfully. She can squeeze and punch them fine and occasionally stands on them, although she doesn't like the feeling of them beneath bear feet. However, knees at best bend my over for a few seconds but most of the time I feel nothing.

tonyr
11-28-2006, 10:16 PM
Bollocks!!! No, the thread hasn't gone down hill at all.

If you want your girlfriend to drop you in pain with a knee or kick, then she has to be accurate and impact with greater force. If she can't generate such force of impact, then she may need to build up her strength and co-ordination, wear heavy footwear or perhaps both. You haven't stated your height and your girlfriends. What build of body do you both have and what are your repective weights? Also what is the respective leg lengths of you both?
With this information, I will be able to assess and hopefully offer further insight.


Well, this thread appears to have gone down hill somewhat! You may be right about the size, but surely an orchidometer must take some account of the thickness of the scrotum - I can't see a doctor slitting it open and lifting your nuts out just to measure them! I must admit my measurements were crude - if you search for it, there is a printable orchidometer available online. If you check the scale carefully you can get it print out nut-sized templates to measure your eggs against. Mine came in well above the largest on there so I did a bit of interpolation and came up with the rough figure for size. I have been told (by a woman with extensive testicular experience and a vice-like grip) that they are the largest she has come across but until they are measured accurately I will agree to only describe them as on the large side of normal.

All this, however, does not help at all with advice on how to ensure any kicks and knees my GF directs in their general direction have the desired effect of crushing them painfully. She can squeeze and punch them fine and occasionally stands on them, although she doesn't like the feeling of them beneath bear feet. However, knees at best bend my over for a few seconds but most of the time I feel nothing.

myeiestem
11-29-2006, 01:37 PM
Will help if it is tied before kneeing. Will prevent them from "escaping".:)

tonyr
11-30-2006, 07:24 PM
TIf they were tied up it would certainly isolate them more. The dude states that his lady can't drop him in pain, so this isolation could help him achieve his desire.
We'll ultimately have to await his reply with furter info.


Will help if it is tied before kneeing. Will prevent them from "escaping".:)

poolman2
12-01-2006, 02:43 AM
Dear Bro Tonyr,

:bananawin

I worry that you may have divulged too much. Fortunately it will go over the heads of the great unwashed, even including many participants in this forum. Anyway the work of our brotherhood (not to mention, that of the sisterhood to whom we do incessant homage and obeisance [this is getting a little bit kinky with my sexy wife being called my sister, and my doing what one must do with a sexy wife] ) must go on.

And remember, don't ask for Trouble; he will always find us. ;)

Now I have to waddle off to bed. My wife needs to work on her knee exercises and I need to provide her with my two perfect knee impact-absorbing pads. Fortunately, if I do a good enough job, she will spend the rest of the night sleeping with her feet propped up on them. :bananajum

poolman2

tonyr
12-01-2006, 10:47 AM
Ssssshhhh,
All secrets are safe:thumbup :ibow4u: :D ;)



Dear Bro Tonyr,

:bananawin

I worry that you may have divulged too much. Fortunately it will go over the heads of the great unwashed, even including many participants in this forum. Anyway the work of our brotherhood (not to mention, that of the sisterhood to whom we do incessant homage and obeisance [this is getting a little bit kinky with my sexy wife being called my sister, and my doing what one must do with a sexy wife] ) must go on.

And remember, don't ask for Trouble; he will always find us. ;)

Now I have to waddle off to bed. My wife needs to work on her knee exercises and I need to provide her with my two perfect knee impact-absorbing pads. Fortunately, if I do a good enough job, she will spend the rest of the night sleeping with her feet propped up on them. :bananajum

poolman2

teapot42
12-05-2006, 02:10 PM
You haven't stated your height and your girlfriends. What build of body do you both have and what are your repective weights? Also what is the respective leg lengths of you both?
With this information, I will be able to assess and hopefully offer further insight.


I suspect that may be part of the problem - she's 5'2 and I'm a good foot taller. She's also very well proportioned - not skinny, not fat, just a perfect womanly shape while I'm on the large side - nearly 15 stone. As for leg length - well, that the only thing I'd change on her if I had the chance as they are a bit, well, stumpy...

However, I'm not sure if that is all that relevant as we've tried things like her standing on a step, me sitting on the floor legs apart and the like which *should* equalise height differences....

penaltykicked
12-05-2006, 02:53 PM
In my opinion thornapple who I think is WIFES BALLS has the best clips of big ballbusting. Unfortunatley my balls are not like his, when my wife saw his clips she immediatly frigged herself at lightspeed to a climax. If he still posts here please continue. My wife has told me how much she loves busting my balls but I think she would trade my balls in a second for that bull sac

tonyr
12-06-2006, 09:29 PM
Thanks for the additional information.
The fact that you have tried to compensate for the hieght difference with no effect, makes me wonder as to her accuracy and power delivery. I still hold firm that you just haven't been busted by the right lady from the perspective of being dropped. You may have a high threshold but this has nothing to do with the size of your nuts.


I suspect that may be part of the problem - she's 5'2 and I'm a good foot taller. She's also very well proportioned - not skinny, not fat, just a perfect womanly shape while I'm on the large side - nearly 15 stone. As for leg length - well, that the only thing I'd change on her if I had the chance as they are a bit, well, stumpy...

However, I'm not sure if that is all that relevant as we've tried things like her standing on a step, me sitting on the floor legs apart and the like which *should* equalise height differences....