Mammoth post jonoffen (too big to ‘quote’). I LOVE :loveeyes your toons. Where are they from? Have you got any more?
Keep up the good work :)
Printable View
Mammoth post jonoffen (too big to ‘quote’). I LOVE :loveeyes your toons. Where are they from? Have you got any more?
Keep up the good work :)
A link to a comic with BB at: http://www.anime-sex-cartoons.com/adultcomics19/10.htm
Inquisitiv you are SUCH a top bloke. I luv your posts ;)
Hey wots that knife for? :eek:
Here's a nice grab from that site...
http://www.anime-sex-cartoons.com/ad...n_slaves03.jpg
Who drew the pics for this message, they're great!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonoffen
And who drew this one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron horse
Hope you like em
Not sure if this has been posted
888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
Note Inserted By Sara:
This member has been banned.
This could have been avoided if the member had only read the thread at the top of each page entitled: "Important Notices To All Members From Forum Administrators ~ ~ {Read Before Posting!}", which you can also get to by clicking:
www.femaledom.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2175
("...your first post can't include an attached pic.")
As it also says in that thread, "The rules in this thread apply to you whether you read them or not."
It also says:
"From time to time new posting rules, tips, advice, and so on will be posted here, so please check this thread occasionally and read any new posts."
The Rules are not arbitrary. In this case, the member probably wanted to attach a pic. But the system doesn't allow first-time posters to attach pics.
Fewer members would run into problems like this if they just took the time to read the thread I already mentioned.
888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
.
Hi there. I drew the pictures using Flash. Can't take all the credit though as i traced the pose. I just changed the face and tits and clothing after that. Haven't got many more cartoons but made some really good (if i say so myself) sarah michelle gellar ball-busting fakes...only not sure if i'm allowed to show them...?
Would have been better if you had given credit for the original art back when you first posted your tracings. Somebody along the way may have removed his signature from the original that you traced (as apparently often happens), but Knave's style is unmistakable. His work (some even still with signatures) appears in several other posts within this same thread. Those socks you erased are one of his well-known trademarks. You may not have spent much time in the ball-busting community but if you pay attention you will recognize that the number of actual contributors of original material is pretty small. Knave is an active member of this forum and most of the others. Even if you didn't know who he is or that the original was his work, you knew it wasn't your own, and in my opinion you should have given credit at the time. Now that you know whose work you traced and know he isn't some long dead unknown doodler, apologies might be in order.Quote:
Originally Posted by jonoffen
You should post'em. Make a photo manip thread, that would be cool.Quote:
Originally Posted by jonoffen
I'd be really interested to see any more cartoons you have, you have obvious talent and it's always exciting to run across fellow BB artists.
Thanks for the encouraging words Al, you're a real stand up guy, but you knew that already.
Wow. Thanks for the awesome dressing-down Tamagotchi.
I am sorry to Knave; I honestly didn’t know who drew the thing – just found it on the net (can’t remember where). If I had known you’re name you can be assured I would have mentioned it as the pictures were merely idle copies I had made for my own amusement. They were never intended to be put on the net until I found this site and wanted to add to it. I never wanted any credit for them. Hope I didn’t piss you off or harm you mentally :) – please take them as a compliment to your artistic prowess. I’m a fan.
Oh, and I'll make sure to put up a manipulated photo thread soon. Thanks
there used to be some pretty good pictures on the aussie bb website, they used to be computer generated but still good, anyone know where they went to?
I've always been a fan of Tumor's work. I can't remember the last time I saw him around though. I think that's who you're thinking of.
-Knave
Wouldn't cartoons be a good way to introduce a girl to BB? I think by showing her some of the cartoons and gauging a reaction is nice little way to find out if she's into it or not. Would like to see more pics like this floating around.
I think so. I've been reluctant to bring up the subject with my gf, but have been slowly bringing things up like cartoons and that wakthesak game just to judge the reaction from that.Quote:
Originally Posted by bizzybb
Persoanlly, I feel, and this is just my opinion, you wouldnt be able to gauge her interest in BB from cartoons. Its too easy to disassociate them from reality, ie: you may find a cartoon of Bushes and Blairs heads on spikes in Downtown Bagdad very funny, or you may laugh like crazy at a cartoon of your Mother inlaw drving off a cliff. Neither of these things mean you actually want either to happen. In fact you may be repulsed if they did happen in real life.
In my humble opinion:
I agree that her reaction to such cartoons would not be the definitive guage of her interest in ballbusting...only a one-on-one conversation would do it.
With that said, I do believe the cartoons are an excellent way to make the introduction of the topic and start the conversation. Breaking the ice to the next level is never easy. If her reaction is very negative about the subject matter of the cartoon, she probably wouldn't be into it. If she laughs and enjoyes the cartoons, you can show her more. One thing I've shown women is the free ball-slapping game "Wak the Sak", here:
http://www.freeworldgroup.com/games/wak/index.html
The game originally had a description saying it was for sadistic girls. The cartoon figure is of a naked man standing there with his exposed balls dangling. You use your cursor to move a hand and slap his balls. The faster and hard you hit his balls, the louder he screams and the higher your score - your finally score is presented next to his balls as they glow red showing the pain you've just inflicted on his balls.
I've introduced it to a number of girls, and some really, really enjoyed it comparing notes as to who could slap his balls the hardest and make him scream the loudest. Although their delight in slapping a virtual man's balls as hard as possible and making him scream as loud as possible doesn't transcend directly into the same desire in real life, one could certainly make the argument it is, at least, and indication they enjoy the concept somehow.
If she continues with interest and enjoyment of the subject matter, I'd think it would be easier to get into substantive conversations with her about it.
Again, IMHO.
:iluvu:
What's this beautiful bb comic!?!?
Something with "gold digger".....
Anyone out there knows about it?
:ibow4u:
can we get the full comic :D or just the name of it ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASTA89882
THAT was the reason i posted it around :)
In my surfing I have discovered thousands of comics that deal with S&M, bondage, torture and the like. The vast majority of these appear to be heterosexually oriented (i.e. man/woman or woman/woman but likely (?) not aimed at a dykey audience). Curiously, those that feature women as the sub out number those where a man is a victim by over 100:1. From where I sit, this balance does not appear to be representative of the scene at large as there are a considerable number of men that are into FemDom. Why is this proportion not represented in the cartoon form? Within the small male submissive cartoon scene BB itself is very rare such that we are more-or-less left with just the few examples shown in this thread. I can think of thousands of cartoons that show women being hung by their tits, having spikes in their cunts etc. etc. Can anybody offer an insight as to the cause of the imbalance in the ratio of cartoons depicting men and women on the receiving end of punishment? I’m just Inquisitiv.
PS. After years of searching, I do now have a small collection of comics that depict some BB :) I haven’t seen these on the web before. I’ll dig ‘em out sometime, scan them and post a few here.
Well, I think it has to do with the fact that most comics are drawn by guys. A guy into femdom knows what he wants done to him. A guy into femsub knows what he wants to do to someone. Drawing a comic where something happens to a character is much more like doing something -to- someone than having it done to you. So a guy into femsub is going to find it more satisfying to draw the femsub comic than a guy who is into femdom is going to find it to draw the femdom comic.
At least, that's my best guess.
Smack
What Smack said.
Plus: there are plenty of men who would fantasize about hurting women, but actually doing so is taboo. While a guy can't actually hand the chick who just dumped him by the tits, he can sure as hell draw a reasonabke likeness.
There is an element of domination in the sub (the "topping from the bottom" thing); consider that, in many videos, the girls wear flimdy outfits of traditional rashy/sexy things like fishnets. Drawing women like that, even if they are busting some balls, is exploitation of the female figure, and if the artist is a wee bit sensitive (many of them dang arrr-tists are), that's going to spoil the mood; it's not a scene of a man being dominated, it's a scene of a woman being exploited. If you fantasize about being dominated, it does not make sense to draw picures of exploiting others -- and, no, I don't think that people think things through that way, I think that there's a conflict that gets resolved that way.
Artists (male artists) prefer to draw chicks. Oh, yeah. Chicks walking the dog, chicks standing there, chicks walking along the beach, chicks with superhero powers flying through the air and throwing Buicks at each other, chicks licking ice cream, chicks, chicks, chicks! And if an artist is going to draw someone nude or semi-nude, does that mean that he is more inclined to draw a nude woamn or a nude man? Exactly. Bring on the chicks!!!
Thank you for your input gentlemen. You present an interesting thesis smack. Perhaps I’m unusual as I would be well into drawing men getting busted. Unfortunately, I carry the handicap of being a really shite artist :( . I did play around with computer technology once and even made some movies that were OK (these were lost when my ex wiped my hard disk :( ) However, due to my handicap none of the material was truly original (i.e. I took somebody else’s work and adapted it). While I’m completely crap, I still gained some satisfaction from it.
Of late I’ve turned my dried-up creative juices to a new topic: It turns out that Kerry from this very forum has a fetish for what I believe is called breath-play. She likes to be hung while she’s fucked. I have to say that this is a completely new one to me but boy does it turn me on to string a chick up like that! I quite like drawing pictures of this too as it turns out. Dolcett (http://www.necrobabes.org/dolcett/main.htm) provides some great ideas and starting material (although I’m not really into spit-roasting lasses). [Julie you may (?) like that site although its v hardcore]
Whoops, I risk going off topic there. So to return to BB: I thought the stuff jonoffen posted was great. Did this involve an art qualification or could a caveman like myself have a stab at this ‘Flash’ stuff? Where have the jonoffen/Knave pics gone (example below)? I loved them:loveeyes. Mimicry is definitely flattering and it didn’t appear that Knave was too bothered about your extension to his art (?). Altered originals or not, I think they’re great so keep up the great work jonoffen!!
Other input appreciated,
Inq
PS. Knave, you appear to be one of the few 'qualified' artists that draw in this area. Got any more stuff you could share with us? :jumpsmile :jumpsmile
PPS. Yes I am inquisitiv in case you were wonderin but i exceeded me upload limit on that account so cannot post attachments
Hello Inquisitiv,Quote:
Originally Posted by inquisitiv
There's an awful lot of great stuff collected here on Legend's page that you might like (sorry if you have already seen the link).
http://www.tlcnet.com/~legend/comics.html
Part of the seeming disproportion between comics and real life (photos/videos of living models) femsub could be that real life femsub material exists, but you and I don't happen to be looking for it. Probably our Internet searches are more geared toward femdom, so that's mainly what we uncover. From what I can see there are far more bondage sites featuring women tied, than men tied, but on the whole I don't see very many of either, as I don't personally like bondage. I think it could be a question of perspective.
David B.
--
http://www.ballbustinggoddess.com/Samples/Updates.html
Hi David,
Thanks for the link. I’ve seen a few of them around before but was unaware of the ‘collection’. Some of it is new to me :) I thought tlcnet.com had given up the ghost. There used to be lots of good stuff there (I think it used to host velvet kick amongst others). Does it host other BB sites?
Femdom/femsub I likes it ALL :) so I don’t generally gear surfing to any particular aspect. Even among the malesub material something like spanking vastly out numbers BB. I’m not sure whether this represents what sub men prefer on the whole (?).
I for one would love to see a well-drawn comic about a lass that likes to torture testicles :) You can do so much more with art than reality.
Cheers,
Inq
He's lying again! He's not lying when he says he's a lightweight when it comes to BB though ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by i-quv
Since this thread continues to grow in length, I felt it warranted a post I made early on. It identifies some websites with, literally thousands of femdom cartoons, and virtually any artist that is into it:
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron horse
Why yes, actually, TLCnet hosts the California Mean Girls site among about a dozen others.Quote:
Originally Posted by inquisitiv