or the fact it's inhumane as fuck?
Printable View
or the fact it's inhumane as fuck?
Because fantasy is just that. For most I think the level of intimacy required for such an act is the real drive. There's a love of having someone focused on your genitals as well, so much so that they would cut them off to possess them. Besides, it's permanent and I think a lot of folks are more into the anticipation than the finality.Quote:
Originally Posted by LilShelly
I would liken it to **** fantasies in women. There are a ton of women out there who love **** fantasy because it makes them feel special that a man would be so out of control over them. This has nothing to do with real **** since it is rarely a crime of passion. The fantasy persists though because it is generally carried out with someone the woman trusts, or at least has some sort of pre-arranged agreement with. That's hardly real ****, but that's not the real goal either.
A lot of folks also have fantasies they've never acted out. Many don't bother to really think them through either. So they don't know how far they really want to go.
Of course these are just my observations and they don't cover every person's experience. I will also admit that I may be biased having gone through the process of acting out a lot of my fantasies as well as many of another person's and havign doen so with several partners. There is a very deep intimacy one can form simply by sharing the experience and workign on making it more satisfying for another. I've seen a lot of couples go through that over the years and it often takes them by surprise. Their fantasies often become less severe, but more deep and meaningful to one another.
Anyway my two cents is on the table.
Thank you for your thoughts. The assumption that two people sharing the intimate moment that they have only dreamed about their entire lives, is inhumane, is surely a popular opinion, but it is only that.
The fact that removing a mans penis would be breaking a law, detours most from acting on their urges. That should not be such an issue if the fantasy being played out were consensual.
Sure it is permanent, but so are tattoos, cosmetic surgery, and ageing.
I dont know, I just think getting to cut off a weiner would be a wonderful experience. That's all.
Shelly;)
Lots of other wonderful ways of depriving a man of his prized processionQuote:
Originally Posted by LilShelly
Without getting yourself in trouble with the law??
haha, its cool to compare cutting off a cock with a tattoo :) And just a short feedback, with such comments you just make the hearts of penectomy-fans beat stronger! I get real horny by reading it :)Quote:
Originally Posted by LilShelly
An act committed by two people without coercion, cannot be inhumane. It shouldn't be illegal either, but I am sure many of us are aware of those ridiculous sodomy laws.
Tattoos and cosmetic surgery are choices that are not entirely permanent, and generally don't lead to a loss of functionality (though boched jobs are always possible). One cannot choose to age or not. That is unless you are considering suicide. Cutting off the genitals is a far more serious change with greater implications. Certainly there are people committed to such a change and I do not doubt they are out there making it happen. I do doubt that the number of people who profess to want it is anywhere near the number who actually do. Sometimes on the path to what you want, you find out that you need something else. It's a journey we all make every time we go on a date.
Also I find it funny that my earlier post has the "r" word for forcible sex bleeped out in a thread where we are discussing ********** and penectomy.
I love your carefree attitude about slicing off a mans penis, just for your own pleasure. From your posts, it is obvious this is something you would love to experience. Finding a man that would allow you to do this may be difficult.
I would take pride in sacrificing my penis for your pleasure, and would look forward to my new life style. Consider this, there would be no recourse.
I'm sorry, but did you just say that an act between two people, wich are both into it, cannot be inhumane :P?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonebear
Sorry, but that's just wrong XD.
Ever heard of pedophiles, aka scum of the earth, those kids think it's all fun and games, and so does the pedo, but it's still fucking wrong.
He said, "an act committed by two people without coercion, cannot be inhumane."Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude
He wasn't trying to justify pedophilia. In the context of U.S. society and its laws there's no reason to believe he was. U.S. laws against pedophilia, statutory ****, etc. are based on the assertion that children can not consent to sex since they can not comprehend the consequences of sex. A prosecutor would assert that a child involved in any sex act was coerced, which is precisely the qualifier Stonebear uses to disqualify an act as "humane".
More men than you think actually DO cut their dicks and balls off - see here for example - BUT BE WARNED, DO NOT watch if you don't want to see mutilated dicks etc.!Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonebear
http://www.image fap.com/pictures/2986998/extreme-penectomy-collection-1?gen=
I was clearly referring to adults. Children cannot legally consent to sex (with a few caveats for teenagers varying from state to state) and thus fit under the coercion part of my original statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude
And I used to work with juvenile sex offenders, most of whom were victims. I am all too familiar with child sexual abuse.
I know this thread is for women, but I would like to pass along a fantasy that a woman I went to college with once shared with me.Quote:
Originally Posted by LilShelly
In my sophomore year of college, one of the girls in our dormitory used to hang out in our room a lot (she dated one of my roommates for a while). She was soft-spoken, a bit of a bookworm, and very intelligent. One day when she was hanging out in our room, she started talking about how it would be "fun" to "******** a man with a rusty butter knife". I still don't know what possessed her to start talking about this in a room with three guys, or why she seemed so completely comfortable telling us about it. But it was her next fantasy that really took the cake: it involved placing a naked man in the hallway of our dormitory, wrapping dental floss around his genitals, and tying it to the doorknobs on either side of the hallway. She would then knock on one of the doors, and when it opened....:(
Of course, the three of us guys were cringing, but what I remember most was how she was smiling the whole time she described this fantasy.
This was back in the 80s, long before the Internet (and fetish websites like this one), so I had never heard anything like this before. It left me wondering to myself, "do girls really think about things like this?" When I found this forum in 2005, I finally got my answer!
Why should girls NOT have sadistic or sadomasochistic fantasies, like men have...?Quote:
Originally Posted by squish
I also like to make sadistic jokes with friends sometimes, and sometimes, some females join in joking, sometimes not, and sometimes you meet someone who is even more sadistic or crueler in his/her fantasy, than yourself... That's just people... Though I also tend to think IF a woman has sadistic tendencies, she can be more extreme. Sometimes it is also shocking how sweet and innocent they seem, not realizing (?) the pain they (would) cause. It's those women we like to watch here, isn't it?
ohhh yessss! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by obedientesticle
Sweetly sadistic is the best kind of sadistic in my opinion. I must admit I do fantasize about a particular ex of mine who just had that lovingly cruel sensability. She'd walk up and wrap her arms around me for a kiss and bring her knee up into my balls and just grind it there while she kissed me......
ah good memories