clothed or unclothed ballbustees

do you prefer to watch ballbusts where the guy is naked or where he is in normal clothing.
i must confess i cant get anything out of watching a naked guy get busted.
for him to be brought low by the lady, he has [for me] got to look in controll of himself to start with.
i suppose it just differences of emphasis for different people....
some guys get off on visualising being humiliated...but my interest is always on the lady.. being cruel.......if the guys a naked pot bellied whimp from the start, it just dont turn me on!
and anyway, ive got no interest..full stop..in seeing other guys naked...in Exactly the same way i hate it when in 70's porn, the camera would flick back and forth between the womans ass and the mans face....i dont want to be looking at a man while i'm gripping my joystick.

so what do you other ballbusting fans feel about this? am i in the minority or the majority?

and for those of you with an encyclopedic knowledge of internet ballbusting, which are the sites that feature mainly clothed men being ballbusted?

I like it when the guy is bare so you can se his balls for maybee the last time..and how much swelling...

I would say naked myself. I also like CFNM, so combining that with naked ballbusting is a plus.

I am a suit and tie man, I always ballbust my balls when I wear suit, put on a tie, I am so turn on when I think a lady abuse suitman, or my boss kick my balls. I am not into naked ballbust.

Absolutely bare ballbustee...i like the women naked, in lingerie or in sexy wears!
my gf loves barefoot...she likes feel everything with her skin!

^ doesn't know difference between buster and bustee...



I like clothed guy and clothed girl. Seems less fake that way.

CWNM works for me.
Sub4her2
PS. There's something about being a male that makes visual effect all the more worth while!!!!!!!;)



http://fapomatic.com/thumbs/0905/ext...lbusting_1.jpg

Guy naked and the woman wearing something sexy. It helps enhance the sense of vulnerability of the guy.

I like them both, there's benifits to both styles. When the dude is naked you see his junk, and i really dont want to see another guys junk. But you also see the solid connections of her foot to his nuts. Whereas if the dude has clothes on he could be wearing a cup for all I know. So yeah, I like them both.

A guy doesn't have to be naked but you have to be able to see what is getting hit (ie. wearing jeans is no good but underwear or nothing is fine). I would be happy to stand totally naked and let a girl kick my balls or i could wear jocks and she could hit my cock and balls ...

It depends, I've seen videos in which the guy was a real meatball or really old - or both at the same time - , in those cases it turns me off completely, It's gross and I'd prefer to see them covered by a huge piece of clove. However if the guy is normal, it's ok because I can see the nude balls crushed and I can understand the painful situtation he's suffering.

About the woman, sometimes dressed, sometimes nude, as it allows me to see her female attributes and the comparison with the weak balls, but, if nude, she must be really gorgeous or she could destroy my imagination too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mork

do you prefer to watch ballbusts where the guy is naked or where he is in normal clothing.
i must confess i cant get anything out of watching a naked guy get busted.
for him to be brought low by the lady, he has [for me] got to look in controll of himself to start with.
i suppose it just differences of emphasis for different people....
some guys get off on visualising being humiliated...but my interest is always on the lady.. being cruel.......if the guys a naked pot bellied whimp from the start, it just dont turn me on!
and anyway, ive got no interest..full stop..in seeing other guys naked...in Exactly the same way i hate it when in 70's porn, the camera would flick back and forth between the womans ass and the mans face....i dont want to be looking at a man while i'm gripping my joystick.

so what do you other ballbusting fans feel about this? am i in the minority or the majority?

and for those of you with an encyclopedic knowledge of internet ballbusting, which are the sites that feature mainly clothed men being ballbusted?

---

Yes, you are in the minority. Here's a poll that was conducted on here a while back regarding your question:
http://www.femaledom.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5846

Men that prefer ballbusting while clothed are about 15% of those men into this fetish. I've seen comparable polls in other forums that reflect this same ratio. In addition, women prefer the men to be nude.

The reason I've seen cited the most is that when men are clothed are in ballbusting depictions they are always faked and not real ballbusting. If it is Hollywood or mainstream filming, we all know they are definitely wearing protective gear....this applies not to 100% of the bustees. So yes, if they are clothed, we can (and do) safely conclude it is faked and not real ballbusting.

For those of us into CFNM ballbusting, we prefer the real mccoy - not the fake ballbusting represented by the clothed scenarios.

Of course, another issue are homophobic men that hate any pornographic depiction wherein a man's cock is shown and they freak out because...if they find anything erotic in something wherein a man's cock is shown, they fear their own sexuality is in question. These men are usually the most vehement in their objections to nude male ballbusting.

So in conclusion, clothed male ballbusting is a minority interest for those guys that like pretend ballbusting, or, are afraid of their own sexual validity.

I typically would say "that's just my opinion", but the above poll confirms it.

The woman hugs the guys who is spreadeagled and tied. Naked body touching naked body. Rather than caress his dick she lifts her knee into his balls. She can aim for one nut or both nuts --- and know she won't miss. The sound of her knee hitting his ball(s) is a real turn on, too. Plus, it's very hard to fake --- no banging sound as a metal or plastic cup is attacked by boots or knee. Seeing the balls being hit is so much better than not.

Even more so for grabbing. She grabs his balls and squeezes. Easy when he's naked. And close ups can show whether she is really squeezing hard or not (say, white marks left by the fingers which disappear a second after she lets go).

The same for punches, slaps, kicks, even biting.

For me, it's not even close.

Usually I would prefer both nude, because when the man is clothed it is probably faked (he might wear a protective cup or something like that under his trousers).
I definetely like to see nude women doing the kicking, and I mean totally nude.

While I like close-ups from the nude women I find zooming at nude males simply disgusting...

And the kicking should be so tough that the man is howling and a bit in despair (means: Beginners are better than experienced bustees)...

From experience, wearing briefs when taking a ball blow can be dangerous.

They are trapped and have no escape.

This issue has been well-debated on other threads.

It really should come down to just personal taste. But so many males are homophobic that we are afraid to admit that we even think about looking at a naked guy, much less allowing ourselves to admit that we actually prefer to see the guy balkers and the gal clad.

And that's just silly.

I am a heterosexual man and I am not afraid to say that I love CFNM.

When I engage in ballbusting with a woman it is usually during a wrestling or fight fantasy. We have a rule that an opponent cannot strike any part of the other person's body that is covered by a bathing suit.

Thus, I leave her no choice but to pull my trunks off during the match if she is going to ballbust me, which we agreed prior to the match that she will do.

At the same time, she remains dominnant and confident in her bikini top and bottom, secure in the knowledge that I cannot strike her in the breast or crotch as long as there is clothing there. She on the other hand wastes no time going to work on my naked manhood. Everybody's happy!

The same is true when I watch images or videos. I prefer the man to be naked, including removing those damn white or black socks. They look so ridiculous. (But that I guess that debate is for another thread.)

I prefer the ballbusting woman in a swimsuit and barefoot, tight sexy jeans and top or even in a leather dominatrix suit with knee-high boots.

Does it make me gay because I prefer looking at pictures of couples with the male nude and the female clothed?

No.

What would make me gay is if I ignored the woman totally and dreamed about going to dinner and dancing and later bl*wing the guy in the photo.

CFNM is not about homosexuality or homophobia. It's about the contrast and control. Society teaches us from a very young age that it is wrong to be naked in the presence of others. So, by that way of thinking, it triggers erotic sensations for many of us watching a domineering partner who is clothed and her submissive partner who is nude.

I can understand those who prefer that either both the man and woman be fully clothed or totally naked. Both of those forms of the fetish can be very erotic, as well.

What surprises me though is the many people who prefer both parties to be clothed or both parties to be naked but who, through their postings, obviously demonstrate that they are not able to accept that they are in the minority. They clearly have no clue.

Poll after poll on this site and others clearly show that, when it comes to ballbusting, the vast majority of men and women prefer to see the male's family jewels flop around after a good kick or swell up after a particularly tight hand squeeze from a clothed female.

Naturally, many of us prefer that, regardless of the state of dress or undress, both the woman and man be attractive, with the man being significantly endowed.

It's not much of a fantasy when the man is 60 years old, bald, obese and has a quarter-inch-long dick above a low-hanging, terribly wrinkled ballsack. It also is true that few of us want to see a toothless, blue-haired granny smashing he withered foot into a guy's exposed package.

That aside, the couple does not have to be dropdead gorgeous for me to enjoy their ball-busting scenario.

A mature woman with a few character lines on her face -- a look hardened by years of frustration with men -- can turn me on as easily as a 20-something, tall supermodel type ballbuster. As for the ballbustee, an average looking guy getting racked in average equipment also works fine for me.

I think the easiest way for me to explain it is that I sort of put myself into the place of the guy in the images or videos. S it is not so much that I am looking at another man. It is more that I am invisioning and empathizing with the orderal he is going through.

That's just my two cents worth.

I consider ageism as evil as racism or sexism.

I prefer the ballbusters to be clothed and the males stripped naken. The CFNM aspect increases the humiliation and exposedness of the males.

cigar4u: I guess you are generalizing a bit too much when "explaining" other peoples preferences. Obviously the phantasies behind BB are very different.

Women clothed, man naked, is in my eyes not "humiliating" but rather boring. While I can understand why others may find it interesting – for me personally it has no "thrill".

In my opinion that proves once again that SM is obviously driven by very individual phantasies...

I want to see both nude. Is there any free nude pussy kicking men to balls video?

I prefer skin on skin, so at least having the balls exposed and out there.

Even a pair of shorts is sufficient to conceal testicular protection.

I can’t abide fake action, so the man has to be naked.

Alec Anaconda

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iron horse

Yes, you are in the minority. Here's a poll that was conducted on here a while back regarding your question:
http://www.femaledom.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5846

Men that prefer ballbusting while clothed are about 15% of those men into this fetish. I've seen comparable polls in other forums that reflect this same ratio. In addition, women prefer the men to be nude.

The reason I've seen cited the most is that when men are clothed are in ballbusting depictions they are always faked and not real ballbusting. If it is Hollywood or mainstream filming, we all know they are definitely wearing protective gear....this applies not to 100% of the bustees. So yes, if they are clothed, we can (and do) safely conclude it is faked and not real ballbusting.

For those of us into CFNM ballbusting, we prefer the real mccoy - not the fake ballbusting represented by the clothed scenarios.

Of course, another issue are homophobic men that hate any pornographic depiction wherein a man's cock is shown and they freak out because...if they find anything erotic in something wherein a man's cock is shown, they fear their own sexuality is in question. These men are usually the most vehement in their objections to nude male ballbusting.

So in conclusion, clothed male ballbusting is a minority interest for those guys that like pretend ballbusting, or, are afraid of their own sexual validity.

I typically would say "that's just my opinion", but the above poll confirms it.

---

Your points are valid and I agree with them, but I just didn't really like how the second to last paragraph came off as a bit aggressive. I personally am not offended, but I enjoy any clothing situation. In real life I enjoy to do it clothed also. Clothed male ballbusting is for people afraid of their sexuality, pretend ballbusting, or just prefer it as a fetish.

I think there's always someone that gets off to something. 2 Girls 1 Cup was most likely directed to a particular audience more unorthodox than even us. :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AGalli

I want to see both nude. Is there any free nude pussy kicking men to balls video?

---

Actually, I have not seen much of this, and it seems to be really hot, so I'd like to come across something like this someday.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iron horse

Yes, you are in the minority. Here's a poll that was conducted on here a while back regarding your question:
http://www.femaledom.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5846

Men that prefer ballbusting while clothed are about 15% of those men into this fetish. I've seen comparable polls in other forums that reflect this same ratio. In addition, women prefer the men to be nude.

The reason I've seen cited the most is that when men are clothed are in ballbusting depictions they are always faked and not real ballbusting. If it is Hollywood or mainstream filming, we all know they are definitely wearing protective gear....this applies not to 100% of the bustees. So yes, if they are clothed, we can (and do) safely conclude it is faked and not real ballbusting.

For those of us into CFNM ballbusting, we prefer the real mccoy - not the fake ballbusting represented by the clothed scenarios.

Of course, another issue are homophobic men that hate any pornographic depiction wherein a man's cock is shown and they freak out because...if they find anything erotic in something wherein a man's cock is shown, they fear their own sexuality is in question. These men are usually the most vehement in their objections to nude male ballbusting.

So in conclusion, clothed male ballbusting is a minority interest for those guys that like pretend ballbusting, or, are afraid of their own sexual validity.

I typically would say "that's just my opinion", but the above poll confirms it.

---

Agreed.

If it's not CFNM it's pointless.

Wow! This is the most heated discussion of clothed vs no clothing I have ever read!

Personally I like CFNM. Not all the models I work with are into that for whatever reason :(

So, I have to take that into consideration when shooting.... So I do prefer to work with ladies that do not mind kicking, kneeing, grabbing, twisting, etc bare balls. Now, that being said, I still shoot some specific niches that are clothed or wearing specific clothing/covering to meet requests.

I don't care about the female but I have zero interest in ballbusting pics/clips with a guy wearring any sort of clothes.

IMHO,

The male should be naked. Otherwise, you cannot confirm the direct impact to his balls and estimate the force of the impact. If he wears clothes, he may also be wearing protection.

I also like to see at least the woman's legs naked/in hose. Nude, shorts, a short dress all work. Pants decidedly do not work. I also prefer her feet to be bare, but pumps are not bad. Boots conceal her natural beauty.

YMMV,

poolman2

Nude males everytime, unless he starts clothed and strips naked as part of a game.