I have almost always worked for at-cost rates; the labour is free. On the other hand, it has been years since I did lots of comics -- I now get assignments to compile periodicals, or to write web pages (i.e., I am being used as a replacement for a 486 - quite an insult).Originally Posted by cutponies
I have noticed the shading; that is something that I never did do well, and it is a useful thing to have to add depth.
But having a particular style, arrrrrgh; this is no real criticism. Well, okay, it IS a criticism, but it is not one that says that you work is bad, because it very obviously is good stuff. Art style leads to sameness. Consider it contrasted with my composition style, which I no longer have since I have lost most of my hearing: I can write a passacaglia and a chaconne, but they will not sound tremendously different. Throw in a fugue, a gavotte, corrente, sarabande, gigue, all that stuff, and I can look at the sheet music and say, "I changed... the key... the chord progression... the instrumentation... thos one has gobs of ornamentation; this other one is spartan... the tempo... I wrote them months apart... and they sound almost the same."
I am not saying that the following is true of you, although it very much was true of me: I had NO imagination to speak of; no matter how much music theory I knew, there was no way to overcome being devoid of that kind of creativity. (I was careful to write down "Whaddaya want for nuthin'?" on each piece; not only would I not have accepted money for them, but nobody would ever have paid anything for them. They were not BAD, just lackluster.)
What this thread could use is for jackasses like me (and Try if he's come out of hiding yet [WINK]) to put some pen to some paper. Dude, I understand the reason why you use the same blue background, but it remains the same blue background.![]()