Originally Posted by
vulneraballs2
Reading this and other threads, I just realized that I prefer art, drawings, cartoons and other "fictional" depictions of ball-busting than "real life" depictions -- i.e., photographs and movies. I asked myself why.
I think one reason is that the fictional depictions are often, if not always, more perfect -- the look of the woman, the smile on her face, the agony of the man, the restraint or bondage. It is idealized. No bored looking Dommes who obviously are into it only to make a buck. No fat guys. No shoddy bondage. This makes sense, since the artists control over his subjects is total -- or at least limited only by his artistic ability.
Another reason is that the fictional and artistic and fictional representations can be, and tend to be, much more brutal. They are not limited by the frailty of the male body, or the practical and legal concerns regarding consent.
I suspect the advantages of artistic and fictionalized representations are much more pronounced in SM, DS, BDSM, and particulalry, than they are in regular, vanilla porn, while the disadvantages are the same.