BB Cartoons 2

[Tamakeri]

In the real world, what would happen to someone other than Rowling who published a book, whatever it's theme or content, called "Harry Potter and---"?

I don't object to this thread. I object to its name! And I never claimed ballbusting cartoons as my own!

Sorry CP- Rowling is pretty specifically and uniquely identified with "Harry Potter and the ..." and I'm sure she actually has legal copyright to back her up.
Again- In my humble opinion- You ARE NOT specifically and uniquely identified with "ballbusting cartoons". Bad comparison.

Sorry to bust your bubble, but there are guys who are "legendary" in the world of ballbusting cartoons- Knave (E.M.) comes to mind for one. This is NOT meant as a dig against you or your style- I know you have a following. But "ballbusting cartoons" doesn't immediately bring to mind "cutponies"- at least for me. I am NOT confused by a similarly named thread and have difficulty understanding people who would be. It's just not that hard to figure out. At the risk of repeating myself- this is not about you- it's a friggin thread about cartoons.

[cutponies]

Sorry CP- Rowling is pretty specifically and uniquely identified with "Harry Potter and the ..." and I'm sure she actually has legal copyright to back her up.
Again- In my humble opinion- You ARE NOT specifically and uniquely identified with "ballbusting cartoons". Bad comparison.

Sorry to bust your bubble, but there are guys who are "legendary" in the world of ballbusting cartoons- Knave (E.M.) comes to mind for one. This is NOT meant as a dig against you or your style- I know you have a following. But "ballbusting cartoons" doesn't immediately bring to mind "cutponies"- at least for me. I am NOT confused by a similarly named thread and have difficulty understanding people who would be. It's just not that hard to figure out. At the risk of repeating myself- this is not about you- it's a friggin thread about cartoons.

When people hear "Harry Potter", they don't automatically think J.K. Rowling. When they hear J.K Rowling they most emphatically think "Harry Potter".

The character "Cutponies" is most certainly associated with ballbusting cartoons, tho' not vice-versa. It's not a question of legality. It's a question of discourtesy. Richter had every right to open a new thread. He had No right to take the name of another thread, Did he even think for a moment that it might cause confusion? So what if you're not confused, others are. so what if you don't care for my pics, others do. You might notice that when you click on the forums list it shows the latest contribution, and lists the name of the thread. Now people don't knowto which "ballbusting cartoons" is being refered. Richter, in doing what he did showed himself arrogant, uncaring, unimaginative, and an intellectual thief (in fact if not in law)! In short an ASSHOLE!

P.S. You're not much better, Posting in a font colour that makes it almost impossible to read! arrogance and discourtesey

[agnetha]

Hello,

and I have been following this thread, I think that it has run its course.

Perhaps Cutponies, you would like to start your own "Cutponies ballbusting cartoons" thread so that your artwork can be on the pedestal you seem so adamant to want. Requests from members can go there too.

For "the rest", have a "ballbusting cartoons" thread. I hope that Knave won't mind being part of "the rest" though.

I feel that no artist can hope to claim any exclusivity or art is surely just an extension of their ego.


And by the way, from a personal point of view: Cutponies, your pictures don't do it for me, they seem repetetive and without emotion.

Aggie xx

[cutponies]

Hello,

and I have been following this thread, I think that it has run its course.

Perhaps Cutponies, you would like to start your own "Cutponies ballbusting cartoons" thread so that your artwork can be on the pedestal you seem so adamant to want. Requests from members can go there too.

For "the rest", have a "ballbusting cartoons" thread. I hope that Knave won't mind being part of "the rest" though.

I feel that no artist can hope to claim any exclusivity or art is surely just an extension of their ego.


And by the way, from a personal point of view: Cutponies, your pictures don't do it for me, they seem repetetive and without emotion.

Aggie xx

You can take or leave my art. Lots of people don't like it. My one and only peeve about all this is that Richter, whatever he thought of Iron-Horse's thread had no right to suborn the name "Ballbusting Cartoons"

[kdunstfan]

Wow dude, it's a forum. He can name a topic whatever he wants.