BB Cartoons 2

[cutponies]

This is total crap CP. This (that) isn't your thread, although certainly you have been a major poster here (there) for quite a few months. You didn't start it, and as I remember, you weren't even posting here for well over a year after the thread was started. What right do you have to threaten people to "take it up with Sharon" to get somebody banned? If there is actually a rule posted on Sharon's board about similarly named threads, then maybe he violated something. I remember that Sarah (back in the day) certainly wanted to keep things tight like that- but Sarah and Sharon parted ways over exactly that kind of regimentation if I'm not mistaken. I don't see any possible harm he could cause by doing what he did, whether it was intentional or not.

And just where do you get off on the copyright infringement and counterfeiting claims. He didn't insult your artwork or your posting, he didn't copy it or misrepresent it- he didn't delete any of your posts and it isn't and never was "your thread". If you actually have "fans" that are in turmoil because they can't find the thread, I suggest you send them a link to it so they don't have that issue.

This isn't about you, dude. I think you may be in a little deep. Just my opinion.

In the real world, what would happen to someone other than Rowling who published a book, whatever it's theme or content, called "Harry Potter and---"?

I don't object to this thread. I object to its name! And I never claimed ballbusting cartoons as my own!

[cutponies]

ok i understand what he was doing here and i appreciate it. this thread is to simply put cartoons in for people to enjoy...the other thread is more of a cutponies request and posting thread that has alot of chitchat that goes on...this is more of a post pictures not talk thread. should it have been named something else? sure. but no use crying over spilled milk.

You're not the one who's P.M.s are full of "What happened to all your 'toons? What happened to the thread, etc.?"etc.

[Tamakeri]

In the real world, what would happen to someone other than Rowling who published a book, whatever it's theme or content, called "Harry Potter and---"?

I don't object to this thread. I object to its name! And I never claimed ballbusting cartoons as my own!

Sorry CP- Rowling is pretty specifically and uniquely identified with "Harry Potter and the ..." and I'm sure she actually has legal copyright to back her up.
Again- In my humble opinion- You ARE NOT specifically and uniquely identified with "ballbusting cartoons". Bad comparison.

Sorry to bust your bubble, but there are guys who are "legendary" in the world of ballbusting cartoons- Knave (E.M.) comes to mind for one. This is NOT meant as a dig against you or your style- I know you have a following. But "ballbusting cartoons" doesn't immediately bring to mind "cutponies"- at least for me. I am NOT confused by a similarly named thread and have difficulty understanding people who would be. It's just not that hard to figure out. At the risk of repeating myself- this is not about you- it's a friggin thread about cartoons.

[cutponies]

Sorry CP- Rowling is pretty specifically and uniquely identified with "Harry Potter and the ..." and I'm sure she actually has legal copyright to back her up.
Again- In my humble opinion- You ARE NOT specifically and uniquely identified with "ballbusting cartoons". Bad comparison.

Sorry to bust your bubble, but there are guys who are "legendary" in the world of ballbusting cartoons- Knave (E.M.) comes to mind for one. This is NOT meant as a dig against you or your style- I know you have a following. But "ballbusting cartoons" doesn't immediately bring to mind "cutponies"- at least for me. I am NOT confused by a similarly named thread and have difficulty understanding people who would be. It's just not that hard to figure out. At the risk of repeating myself- this is not about you- it's a friggin thread about cartoons.

When people hear "Harry Potter", they don't automatically think J.K. Rowling. When they hear J.K Rowling they most emphatically think "Harry Potter".

The character "Cutponies" is most certainly associated with ballbusting cartoons, tho' not vice-versa. It's not a question of legality. It's a question of discourtesy. Richter had every right to open a new thread. He had No right to take the name of another thread, Did he even think for a moment that it might cause confusion? So what if you're not confused, others are. so what if you don't care for my pics, others do. You might notice that when you click on the forums list it shows the latest contribution, and lists the name of the thread. Now people don't knowto which "ballbusting cartoons" is being refered. Richter, in doing what he did showed himself arrogant, uncaring, unimaginative, and an intellectual thief (in fact if not in law)! In short an ASSHOLE!

P.S. You're not much better, Posting in a font colour that makes it almost impossible to read! arrogance and discourtesey

[agnetha]

Hello,

and I have been following this thread, I think that it has run its course.

Perhaps Cutponies, you would like to start your own "Cutponies ballbusting cartoons" thread so that your artwork can be on the pedestal you seem so adamant to want. Requests from members can go there too.

For "the rest", have a "ballbusting cartoons" thread. I hope that Knave won't mind being part of "the rest" though.

I feel that no artist can hope to claim any exclusivity or art is surely just an extension of their ego.


And by the way, from a personal point of view: Cutponies, your pictures don't do it for me, they seem repetetive and without emotion.

Aggie xx

[cutponies]

Hello,

and I have been following this thread, I think that it has run its course.

Perhaps Cutponies, you would like to start your own "Cutponies ballbusting cartoons" thread so that your artwork can be on the pedestal you seem so adamant to want. Requests from members can go there too.

For "the rest", have a "ballbusting cartoons" thread. I hope that Knave won't mind being part of "the rest" though.

I feel that no artist can hope to claim any exclusivity or art is surely just an extension of their ego.


And by the way, from a personal point of view: Cutponies, your pictures don't do it for me, they seem repetetive and without emotion.

Aggie xx

You can take or leave my art. Lots of people don't like it. My one and only peeve about all this is that Richter, whatever he thought of Iron-Horse's thread had no right to suborn the name "Ballbusting Cartoons"

[kdunstfan]

Wow dude, it's a forum. He can name a topic whatever he wants.

[Richter]

http://orz.gurochan.net/req/kareha.pl/1140117184/

Hey, came across this site with a lot of bb cartoons. I'm posting a few here from it.

The post confusion doesn't even matter anymore. This CP guy has managed to turn this thread into the exact same thing as the previous thread (not "his thread"). Now it's a lot of people chit-chatting and no pictures. I would gladly change the name of it to stop this, but I don't see an edit button. If a mod can change this, I encourage it. BB Cartoons, BB Cartoons 2, Various Cartoons, or whatever. It seems to me that if this CP guy wants his own thread, he should start his own thread. If I had my "work" posted and for people to view, I'd want them to see it all in one page, not have to go through 126 pages of mindless arguing to get to see a single pic.


btw, the first one is animated and really cute. The preview seems messed up, but it works fine if clicked.

[Sharon.Femaledom.com]

Hi guys,

As I got a PM from Cutponies about the name thing and as the starter of this thread have suggested to rename it I have done so to BB Cartoons 2.

Now everybody kiss and make up

[bcurt]

I 2nd what Tamakeri said!
Get a life.

bcurt

[tedkord]

I'm in favor of this new thread. I quit paying attention to the old one because it became over ran with to much dialog. There would be 2 or 3 pages without one toon pic posted.
Is the thread to post toons or discuss them. There are threads dedicated to pics only. Maybe there should be a pic only toon thread.

[Third_Horseman]

Agreed. The other thread is text, long periods of dry spells, and then a new ********** pic every now and again. It's not even ballbusting anymore...it's all about eunuchs. Not that I have anything against those types of pics, but really, I'd prefer the title to actually describe the thread content.

A polite suggestion to Cutponies, if he considers a secondary thread a personal slight, would be to start a unique thread for his own work. "Cutponies' Art" or something similar. That way nobody would get lost on their way to see his new stuff and people would know what type of pictures they were getting when they clicked there instead of getting ********** when they're seeking ballbusting. It would also help keep all the requests flying his way more organized, which could only be helpful to him.

Anyway, that was a huge swerve off topic. Mostly I'm curious where TedKord (Blue Beetle fan, much?) got those wonderful Kamitora pics that I've never seen!? If there's more of that out there, I definitely want some!

And just to keep this thread on topic (not a lot of text...just a lot of pics), here's a few from my own collection.

[freakyboy]

Where do you find all those great pictures?

[giuseppes1979]

ok i understand what he was doing here and i appreciate it. this thread is to simply put cartoons in for people to enjoy...the other thread is more of a cutponies request and posting thread that has alot of chitchat that goes on...this is more of a post pictures not talk thread. should it have been named something else? sure. but no use crying over spilled milk.

totally agreed

[mgspecter]

ok so ummm...yeah stop posting regarding the fight over the name of this thread...the only way to B*%$# about it is to actually post something. (I'm sure i speak for all when i say we'd appreciate it.) if you don't bad things may happen