This issue has been well-debated on other threads.
It really should come down to just personal taste. But so many males are homophobic that we are afraid to admit that we even think about looking at a naked guy, much less allowing ourselves to admit that we actually prefer to see the guy balkers and the gal clad.
And that's just silly.
I am a heterosexual man and I am not afraid to say that I love CFNM.
When I engage in ballbusting with a woman it is usually during a wrestling or fight fantasy. We have a rule that an opponent cannot strike any part of the other person's body that is covered by a bathing suit.
Thus, I leave her no choice but to pull my trunks off during the match if she is going to ballbust me, which we agreed prior to the match that she will do.
At the same time, she remains dominnant and confident in her bikini top and bottom, secure in the knowledge that I cannot strike her in the breast or crotch as long as there is clothing there. She on the other hand wastes no time going to work on my naked manhood. Everybody's happy!
The same is true when I watch images or videos. I prefer the man to be naked, including removing those damn white or black socks. They look so ridiculous. (But that I guess that debate is for another thread.)
I prefer the ballbusting woman in a swimsuit and barefoot, tight sexy jeans and top or even in a leather dominatrix suit with knee-high boots.
Does it make me gay because I prefer looking at pictures of couples with the male nude and the female clothed?
No.
What would make me gay is if I ignored the woman totally and dreamed about going to dinner and dancing and later bl*wing the guy in the photo.
CFNM is not about homosexuality or homophobia. It's about the contrast and control. Society teaches us from a very young age that it is wrong to be naked in the presence of others. So, by that way of thinking, it triggers erotic sensations for many of us watching a domineering partner who is clothed and her submissive partner who is nude.
I can understand those who prefer that either both the man and woman be fully clothed or totally naked. Both of those forms of the fetish can be very erotic, as well.
What surprises me though is the many people who prefer both parties to be clothed or both parties to be naked but who, through their postings, obviously demonstrate that they are not able to accept that they are in the minority. They clearly have no clue.
Poll after poll on this site and others clearly show that, when it comes to ballbusting, the vast majority of men and women prefer to see the male's family jewels flop around after a good kick or swell up after a particularly tight hand squeeze from a clothed female.
Naturally, many of us prefer that, regardless of the state of dress or undress, both the woman and man be attractive, with the man being significantly endowed.
It's not much of a fantasy when the man is 60 years old, bald, obese and has a quarter-inch-long dick above a low-hanging, terribly wrinkled ballsack. It also is true that few of us want to see a toothless, blue-haired granny smashing he withered foot into a guy's exposed package.
That aside, the couple does not have to be dropdead gorgeous for me to enjoy their ball-busting scenario.
A mature woman with a few character lines on her face -- a look hardened by years of frustration with men -- can turn me on as easily as a 20-something, tall supermodel type ballbuster. As for the ballbustee, an average looking guy getting racked in average equipment also works fine for me.
I think the easiest way for me to explain it is that I sort of put myself into the place of the guy in the images or videos. S it is not so much that I am looking at another man. It is more that I am invisioning and empathizing with the orderal he is going through.
That's just my two cents worth.
 |
 |
 |
|||||||
 |
|||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|||
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by iron horse
