parece que esta pelicula va a tener alguna catracion o penectomia http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1533058/ ya les diré
parece que esta pelicula va a tener alguna catracion o penectomia http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1533058/ ya les diré
I like this one so much
http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/3676415/Girls-Fantasy
![]()
Loving the fact that there so many women out there who's fantasy is to cut a guys dick or balls off and keep for filling that fantasy.But for us guys we get one chance, when its gone its gone. But I'll always remember her smug face as she leaves my life happy and horny.
Thank you for sharing.
I think its so exciting to see 1 penis is cuted)
Society keeps us from fulfilling our fantasies for fear of negative repercussion. The blame is put on the women, and man is given sympathy.
Well to be fair, losing your cock is a pretty big deal, and if the man is unwilling, it is an act of horror, but us guys here don't really belong in the group of men that faints whenever the subject comes up, I'm sure lil shelly, that you'd find one or 2 guys here that would actually let you do it
"they're ripe for the taking"
yes they are ^^
Well whenever there's a story like that in the news, it's NEVER a consensual act. As such, it's right to blame the perpetrator and sympathize with the victim. After all, if a man fulfills his fantasy of r.aping a woman, you wouldn't defend him by saying "Oh he was just acting out his fantasy," would you?
it would be consensual with me![]()
So consensual makes it ok? I think I would be in trouble either way.
Consent makes all the difference. I think most people would agree that whatever two consenting adults do behind closed doors is fine as long as no one else gets hurt.
You could still be in trouble if the authorities found out (at the very least because you performed surgery without a medical license). But if your "victim" was a consenting volunteer, then he probably wouldn't contact the authorities.
You'd run into a lot of laws- I don't know, surgery without a license?
If there's any exceptions to the laws against permanently damaging someone, they're going to be pretty explicit about it being medical-only. Nobody who writes a law against chopping someone's arm off is going to think "gee, what if they want their arm chopped off?" They'll think "how do we keep surgeons from being sued," but that's it.