I tried to look up some info on this. Apparently, this is decade-old news. Some woman created this artwork (and the other end of the clothesline is supposedly done up into a noose) and hung it in a public library as a protest against ****. An enraged man tore it down because he said pornography didn't belong in a library where small children were very likely to see it.
She sued him.
I don't know how the suit was decided.
Important to note: the library's director (a woman) had forbidden her employees to hang an American flag in the entrance to the library on the grounds that it could be seen as offensive. But she defended the decision to allow this art on the grounds of freedom of speech.
Personally, I see it as decorative. Pretty colors, and all. Appropriate for an art museum...but not in a public library. If a man can be arrested for showing his own winkie to a kid in public, it sure demonstrates the hypocrisy of our law that these two women (who excercised the same bad judgment) weren't hauled off to jail, too.
Having met girls who openly admitted having penis envy to me, and others who I suspect had it as well but would rather die than admit it because that would make her feel like a traitor to her own gender, I've come to the conclusion that penis envy and penis abhorrence can be opposite ends of the same damn baton. And some female kinksters can twirl that baton like experts.
But is this the problem of radical feminists? Maybe. Maybe not.
Having read a lot of their stuff online, I can safely say that their minds have been incurably poisoned by misandry. Why else do they attack maleness in general, rather than the specific individuals who are guilty of the crime they are protesting? Killing two birds with one stone, I think. As long as you are "********** the ******," why not also offend the "priviliged gender" at the same time?







Reply With Quote
