Quote Originally Posted by Rebecca View Post
So circumcision isn't mutilation?
No, not in the sense of irreparably damaging an essential function of the body. His willy still works; if it's been severed completely, it doesn't (obviously). However, this is really a question of semantics so if circumcision is included in your understanding of the definition of 'mutilation' then I'm prepared to cede that point. What is perhaps a more pertinent question is whether or not such things can be justified.

Quote Originally Posted by Rebecca View Post
And circumcision IS needless.
Actually it can have strong religious significance and, in Judaism at least, is essential to be a part of the the covenant with God.