Women arrested for cutting off husband's penis

[bbbb]

Actually we do. At least it was widespread in the past and now its still out there, just not as big. Need some examples?

If she didn't dress that way she wouldn't of been raped; if she wasn't promiscuous she wouldn't of been raped; if she wasn't out late and so on.
Its not hatred towards men. Its just the domination fantasy, and theres nothing more dominating than a woman removing a man ability to have sex.

We all say murder is bad but murder in self defense is okay, is the same way i don't want a gang of penis cutters just randomly removing penises only if there is a justifiable reason in my eyes.

I have heard/read many feminists stating what you *claim* here... yet, here I am; a man in my late 30s, and I have as yet never, NOT ONCE, in the real world heard a single man say "She deserved to be raped"

Not

Once

Ever


It IS hatred towards other men when you (not you personally, but the generic 'you') continually justifies, warrants, excuses, marginalize the reality that a woman has just attacked a man in the most dehumanizing way possible. This IS worse than any rape as rape-victims are not typically left in a similar position.

There's another story from February, whereby a man tied his wife up and burned her genitals so badly they were left heavily disfigured. She needs re-constructive surgery now.


Do you think she deserved that?

Maybe she had an affair?
Maybe she slapped him?
Maybe she committed paternity fraud?
Maybe she slept with his brother?
Maybe she hit his child?



It doesn't matter what she did - she did not deserve that... or do you think she did? Can you justify this man doing this to her, like you can justify a woman doing what she's done to the man?

If you can justify either of them - you're a sexist and clearly support abuses upon humans.

Your kind don't deserve to enjoy the freedoms the internet offers - people like you should be locked away for the good of society.

And please, this "women of the past were oppressed then came feminism and liberated them" meme that you implied is ridiculous.

Feminism has caused nothing but problems for most women - it was conceived for middle-class white women only, black women and other minority women were not supposed to take advantage of it, and that they did has upset many iconic feminists (e.g. one leading feminist set up abortion clinics for black women with the logic that black people needed to be aborted out of existence - not to help them. IOW, feminism is based largely on racism)

[finally]

I have as yet never, NOT ONCE, in the real world heard a single man say "She deserved to be raped"

Not

Once

Ever

Just one page before this, but too bad: You'll probably state OneBadMamaJama would not say so in your "real world". May we ask him?

[...]I hope she gets shanked in prison.

[finally]

I really don't understand what "you" are raging about. You are fighting Windmills.

I, for myself, state: I don't know what happened in that special case and I don't have to, because I'm not the judge! I'm just a pervert observer and I'm free to speculate.
I don't speculate about him havin done anything bad to her in order to justify what she did, because no "moral" can justify this of course and women who dismember "moraly bad men" are NOT my fetish anyway.
But I DO "disgustingly and continually try to justify women who mutilate men by saying 'if'" because MY FETISH are women who cut off dicks because THEY ENJOY IT!
So I keep saying "IF", also in this case, because, who knows? All she sayed was he "deserved it" and she made no effort to conceal what she did, so she must be very certain about this.
So if I ever loose my dick, it may well look just like this case to you, but you would be wrong!

[bull4you]

Seems there are many guys here very much sensible to the plight those men who have been mutilated by wife/GF/any other woman. That's really nice. We may have fantasies, we may be perverts but at the end of the day, we are still human beings.

Some men are completely sex starved, alwasy thinks with those parts they have between their legs. Let us show some sympathy, after all they are not only pervert, they are sick.

these men don't have other option than supporting what ever woman do. All these Ifs and buts used by them shows the degree of sickness they have.

Of course, These people are dangerous to live in civilized society. Because they ruin other's life royally. To stop such people, all we need to do is giving our version, our view against their inhuman views. Remember, you can't change their inhuman behaviour. (Hell we need not to change them, isn't it)

The only destiny they have is "watching woman abusing men or assuming it and shagging".

[bull4you]

I really don't understand what "you" are raging about. You are fighting Windmills.

I, for myself, state: I don't know what happened in that special case and I don't have to, because I'm not the judge! I'm just a pervert observer and I'm free to speculate.
I don't speculate about him havin done anything bad to her in order to justify what she did, because no "moral" can justify this of course and women who dismember "moraly bad men" are NOT my fetish anyway.
But I DO "disgustingly and continually try to justify women who mutilate men by saying 'if'" because MY FETISH are women who cut off dicks because THEY ENJOY IT!
So I keep saying "IF", also in this case, because, who knows? All she sayed was he "deserved it" and she made no effort to conceal what she did, so she must be very certain about this.
So if I ever loose my dick, it may well look just like this case to you, but you would be wrong!

Dude, actually the thing is there is no case in past, present and in future which deserve this kind of punishment. So, all your ifs and buts are nothing but some crude jokes which no one enjoys, except you.

Why we are doing all these? what we will get?

I am doing it because, my perversion should not ruin men's life in society. Remember, because of these kind of pervasive support, women are escaping from such henious crimes. Men could have opposed and reacted strongly at the time of lorena bobbit did this to a man. Sadly many perverts like you and me supported it and cheered it. That's why many women are now feeling, they can do anything and can escaping by just saying " He is a wife beater or aggressor or some shit".

Who is respondible for this, people like you and me. Now many of us relaised and opposing (Hell, better late than never). Otherwise, why the hell anyone posts these many number of replies in porn site?

[bull4you]

Just one page before this, but too bad: You'll probably state OneBadMamaJama would not say so in your "real world". May we ask him?

Ah, only after reading that news and her justification. He just said it, not celebrated or enjoyed when it really happend. :P

And one thing I can't understand, why the hell that women need to do it. There are countless number of laws in favor of women, if she really face some problems. Why she didn't use them instead of resorting to these kind of inhuman acts. Did you ever think that? Because, they know there are many men and women who brainlesly support her.

[finally]

but I disagree on so many aspects of what you say that I don't think we will find a great agreement.

Who is respondible for this, people like you and me.

No. I don't carry responsibilities for anything any women does. You think:

That's why many women are now feeling, they can do anything and can escaping

I say: Now? Women KNOW they can do almost anything and escape and they know EXACTLY how far the can go in any situation and they GO EXACTLY so far AND a little bit more. That's women. You never heared of the "female" social powers? That's part of it. That's why many say women are coldly calculating or "diplomatic". It has nothing to do with what I say, or what any man says. There is in fact nothing you can say to stop a woman from doing exactly what she wants. And to top that: There is no way to make her tell you what that is.

But even if you don't want to look at things like that:
Sorry, I take notice but I don't accept this "social" reponsibilty here for me. I'm far from thinking so.

I have the feeling you apply your personal views to others. Don't you know? Others are different:

We enjoys pain, but it must be done with mutual consent, not as a crimes. If we enjoy even crimes, we are not human beings. We are just pathetic animals.

Sorry, You see: I feel so. So you say, I'm nothing but a pathetic animal? Because of my sexual feelings, because I enjoy the thought of something UNJUST happen to ME? Should I lie and not tell, that my dick would get hard if a woman held the knife against it? It's just a fact and it's not the pain that I ejoy, you see?

And one thing I can't understand, why the hell that women need to do it...

See, I like you much better, when you think about something.

[bbbb]

waffle waffle blah blah

The fact is, men do not justify rape of women like YOU and women justify those women who sexually mutilate men. The man in this case was only guilty of wanting a divorce - nothing more. A fucking divorce.

So for all your "ifs" and "buts", the only 'if' issue is this; "does divorce justify sexually mutilating another human?"

If you think so - as you have demonstrated repeatedly already - then the women that imitate 70% of divorces also deserve to be sexually mutilated by the husband they're abandoning.

IF


But unlike you - I'm not going to try and justify such a hateful and bigoted POV.

[finally]

"does [anything] justify sexually mutilating another human?"

In your case?

[bbbb]

In your case?

Nothing - I don't promote such hateful bigotry, unlike you.

Divorce.

This man was mutilated for wanting a divorce - and you find it amusing and acceptable?

Sick.

[finally]

Your fighting the wrong enemy.
But it's ok. If I'm ever in doubt about what my views are, I can always ask YOU.

[bbbb]

Your fighting the wrong enemy.
But it's ok. If I'm ever in doubt about what my views are, I can always ask YOU.

You're the one promoting YOUR views - not me. I'm simply calling you out on the bigotry and sexism of them.

I'm sorry it upsets you so much - I'm more sorry you have them in the first place.

Perhaps if you have a Son and he becomes a victim of this, perhaps then you may understand just how hateful your view is.

[finally]

Perhaps if you have a Son and he becomes a victim of this, perhaps then you may understand just how hateful your view is.

Don't forget that you don't know nothing about what I have or have lost.
You call me hateful, bigoted, sexist, sick, yes you go so far to say: "you're a sexist and clearly support abuses upon humans [...] people like you should be locked away for the good of society."
Are you alright?

Try citing ME, why do I deserve to be called like that?

I understand very well, what you imply to be my views and I see your "noble" motivations to fight this, so no hard feelings!
But if you want to be so noble, you should also try to be just. And a little politeness always helps, anyway.

[Sockmess]

I have heard/read many feminists stating what you *claim* here... yet, here I am; a man in my late 30s, and I have as yet never, NOT ONCE, in the real world heard a single man say "She deserved to be raped"

Not

Once

Ever

I do not know about your life. If you lived that long and never heard it well then who am i to say your a liar? All I know i heard that plenty of times from men and other women when it comes reasoning why that woman was raped.

It IS hatred towards other men when you (not you personally, but the generic 'you') continually justifies, warrants, excuses, marginalize the reality that a woman has just attacked a man in the most dehumanizing way possible. This IS worse than any rape as rape-victims are not typically left in a similar position.

Not hatred towards men. Just an appreciation towards women who do evil things like deny a man a sex life within my specified reason.

There's another story from February, whereby a man tied his wife up and burned her genitals so badly they were left heavily disfigured. She needs re-constructive surgery now.

Women commiting sexual violence on men is turn on for me, men committing sexual violence on women does not turn me on. So you story has no justification in my book because it does not turn me on. A woman drugging her soon to be ex husband and then tying him up sawing away at his meat... Thats a turn on so i will look for ways to justify it.

[bbbb]

Women commiting sexual violence on men is turn on for me, men committing sexual violence on women does not turn me on. So you story has no justification in my book because it does not turn me on. A woman drugging her soon to be ex husband and then tying him up sawing away at his meat... Thats a turn on so i will look for ways to justify it.

So you enjoy humans torturing one another?

Some find it a turn on when a child is tortured... is that ok too?
[if it's not ok - do you find those who DO find it ok/a turn on to be sick in the head?]

Some find it a turn on when a child is raped... is that ok as well?
[if it's not ok - do you find those who DO find it ok/a turn on to be sick in the head?]

What about animals, some humans torture animals... is that ok?
[if it's not ok - do you find those who DO find it ok/a turn on to be sick in the head?]

How about elderly, some people have been known to torture elderly... does that turn you on?
[if it's not ok - do you find those who DO find it ok/a turn on to be sick in the head?]


She didn't deny him a sex life - she tortured the guy. Do you folks not realize the difference?
She had not right to deny him a sex life, let alone drug him and torture him.

Now if they had made an agreement and the torture was consensually / mutually agreed - then fine.. that's up to them - but to torture someone like this is beyond disgusting, and it is totally fucked up that some pricks on a fetish board would confuse torture with their fetish!!!