Changes came in after numerous requests by men's groups which were fought against by feminist groups.

You still haven't told me who these feminist lobby groups are or how they have so much power over politicians/judges etc. Surely if they are so massive and organised there would be clear evidence of who they were and what their policies were.

It spoke about a bunch of men discussing women's reproductive rights

Maybe the problem was that a bunch of men were discussing women's reproductive rights as if they should have power over them? Wouldn't you be offended if a bunch of women were talking about how all men should be ****** to donate sperm or some other thing that meant we didn't have control over our bodies?

Similarly, (link) demonstrated feminist censorship and focus.

I don't see the problem with removing 'jokes' about **** and domestic violence from facebook.

You are also completely misinterpreting people. 'Nothing less than equality is acceptable' clearly states that the equality is satisfactory and being less than equal isn't good enough. It says nothing about wanting to being superior. If they wanted superiority then equality wouldn't be acceptable would it?

Quote Originally Posted by Richter
They can't do it privately. They need the possibility that someone will agree with them so they won't seem so sad and pathetic.
Dude, its one thread. No-one is ******* you to read any of it.