Grabbing and squeezing

[Messalina]

Hi Melisa,

Unfortunately I do not have the translation but I will look for it.
I worked in India for 2 years so I am surprised to see such a bold movie
I had female partner at that time that was Muslim but I was not able to convince her to do too much in domination field
It is their culture. She felt quite not comfortable with me in a submissive position

I am also a bit curious about you if you like to talk about
Are you enjoying being in a dominant position with your husband?
I mean is it a power - sub relation or more fetish oriented?
Do you also feel those experiences like a fetish for you or maybe like a needed bound with you husband?

Also,
Merry Christmas!

Hello Sebi40,

How are you? The name is Messalina, not Melisa. Thank you, for your promised efforts in my behalf. Indeed, I should greatly appreciate an English version. Unfortunately, I have never visited the subcontinent. I have traveled to and lived in a number majority Islamic countries. Your comments about Muslim women have some merit. However, in my experience it very much depends on the individual. There are some Muslim women who, could be quite brutal... given the chance. That is, if there would be no repercussions. A good many Muslim women are oppressed, certainly by European and North American standards.

I do not want to be in a "dominant position with " my husband. People seem to see me that way. This is because; I am older, taller and earn more money than he does. Also, I seem to have a higher social standing than my lad. Mainly, because of my first husband. I do not dominate my spouse, nor do I have any desire to. The closest we come to anything of this nature is in the bedroom. However, even there I do not 'dominate'. Rather, I like to be 'conquered'. That is, sometimes I will resist his amorous efforts til, he has 'overpowered' me. That is, by pinning me or by seducing me. BTW, I do my best to cater to the husband's kinks and fetishes.


Messalina

[sebi40]

Hello Sebi40,

How are you? The name is Messalina, not Melisa. Thank you, for your promised efforts in my behalf. Indeed, I should greatly appreciate an English version. Unfortunately, I have never visited the subcontinent. I have traveled to and lived in a number majority Islamic countries. Your comments about Muslim women have some merit. However, in my experience it very much depends on the individual. There are some Muslim women who, could be quite brutal... given the chance. That is, if there would be no repercussions. A good many Muslim women are oppressed, certainly by European and North American standards.

I do not want to be in a "dominant position with " my husband. People seem to see me that way. This is because; I am older, taller and earn more money than he does. Also, I seem to have a higher social standing than my lad. Mainly, because of my first husband. I do not dominate my spouse, nor do I have any desire to. The closest we come to anything of this nature is in the bedroom. However, even there I do not 'dominate'. Rather, I like to be 'conquered'. That is, sometimes I will resist his amorous efforts til, he has 'overpowered' me. That is, by pinning me or by seducing me. BTW, I do my best to cater to the husband's kinks and fetishes.


Messalina

Hi Messalina,
Beautiful name, sorry for misspelling

I had a jung subordinate from Pakistan with a very strong tradition. His family was direct descendens from Mohammed. He was about to married and told me that he expect his wife to stay home taking care of kids, even if she was in final year of medicine faculty.
I told him that this is not fine and he told me again about his family history. Then he married her and I moved in another place.
Three years later I had a call from him. He was in USA because his wife get a job there as medical doctor. He left his job in his home country and wanted now a recommendation later from me in order to get a job in USA.
I just remembered him about his believes and thoughts before marriage. He admitted that his wife was tough and smart. So he had some arguments with his family and his own beliefs but finally followed her.

Quoting you:
sometimes I will resist his amorous efforts til, he has 'overpowered' me. That is, by pinning me or by seducing me
and
I do my best to cater to the husband's kinks and fetishes

I really love those 2 sentences. Your husband is a lucky man.

In case you have a Fetlife account and you are interested, here is mine, I will enjoy reading some of your posts or following you.

Unfortunately this site is dying, the owner left.

BR
Sebastian

[Messalina]

Hi Messalina,
Beautiful name, sorry for misspelling

I had a jung subordinate from Pakistan with a very strong tradition. His family was direct descendens from Mohammed. He was about to married and told me that he expect his wife to stay home taking care of kids, even if she was in final year of medicine faculty.
I told him that this is not fine and he told me again about his family history. Then he married her and I moved in another place.
Three years later I had a call from him. He was in USA because his wife get a job there as medical doctor. He left his job in his home country and wanted now a recommendation later from me in order to get a job in USA.
I just remembered him about his believes and thoughts before marriage. He admitted that his wife was tough and smart. So he had some arguments with his family and his own beliefs but finally followed her.

Quoting you:
sometimes I will resist his amorous efforts til, he has 'overpowered' me. That is, by pinning me or by seducing me
and
I do my best to cater to the husband's kinks and fetishes

I really love those 2 sentences. Your husband is a lucky man.

In case you have a Fetlife account and you are interested, here is mine, I will enjoy reading some of your posts or following you.

Unfortunately this site is dying, the owner left.

BR
Sebastian

Hello Sebi40,

Lovely, to hear from you. I am pleased, you realised not all Muslim women are submissive. Yes, a good many are. However, not all are willing to subordinate themselves to their husbands even under threat of violence. Sometime ago, I was working in an Islamic country in which, it was part of the accepted culture for husbands to beat their wives. One of my Islamic (male) colleagues announced and invited me to his wedding. The woman he wed is a Muslim. Also, she is an American woman who, moved to his country to care for aging relatives. She and I became close friends.

We worked together on a project to benefit refugee women and their dependents. Many of these women suffered abuse at the hands of foreign fighters and from the men in their lives. One day; my Muslim friend, an international aid worker and I were having lunch. Somehow, violence against women in that part of the world came up. Also, how systemic it was. Before I could stop her, the aid worker asked if, my Muslim friend's husband had ever mistreated her. She responded "Only once". Naturally, the woman said "What happened?". Since, my colleague's wife decided to speak on the matter, I ceased trying to quiet the aid worker. My new found friend responded "I planted my foot so far up between his legs that, he never raised a hand to me again".

The aid worker laughed and even cheered. However, my Muslim friend's face was grim. I asked the Canadian woman to excuse us, so that I could speak intimately. When she departed, I said "Tell me". She replied "I lost my temper, I lost control". I nodded in understanding. She had not 'measured' her kick, to her man's privates. Her newlywed husband had required surgery. Also, whilst it is theoretically 'possible', (in reality) it is very unlikely they will be able to have children.

I am pleased matters seemed to have worked out, for your Pakistani subordinate. Indeed, I am especially gratified to learn his wife did not sacrifice years of education and training, to a sexist tradition.

"I really love those two sentences. Your husband is a lucky man. Thank you. I like to think that, we enjoy a symbiotic relationship.

No, I do not "have a Fetlife account".

Messalina

[sebi40]

Hello Sebi40,

Lovely, to hear from you. I am pleased, you realised not all Muslim women are submissive. Yes, a good many are. However, not all are willing to subordinate themselves to their husbands even under threat of violence. Sometime ago, I was working in an Islamic country in which, it was part of the accepted culture for husbands to beat their wives. One of my Islamic (male) colleagues announced and invited me to his wedding. The woman he wed is a Muslim. Also, she is an American woman who, moved to his country to care for aging relatives. She and I became close friends.

We worked together on a project to benefit refugee women and their dependents. Many of these women suffered abuse at the hands of foreign fighters and from the men in their lives. One day; my Muslim friend, an international aid worker and I were having lunch. Somehow, violence against women in that part of the world came up. Also, how systemic it was. Before I could stop her, the aid worker asked if, my Muslim friend's husband had ever mistreated her. She responded "Only once". Naturally, the woman said "What happened?". Since, my colleague's wife decided to speak on the matter, I ceased trying to quiet the aid worker. My new found friend responded "I planted my foot so far up between his legs that, he never raised a hand to me again".

The aid worker laughed and even cheered. However, my Muslim friend's face was grim. I asked the Canadian woman to excuse us, so that I could speak intimately. When she departed, I said "Tell me". She replied "I lost my temper, I lost control". I nodded in understanding. She had not 'measured' her kick, to her man's privates. Her newlywed husband had required surgery. Also, whilst it is theoretically 'possible', (in reality) it is very unlikely they will be able to have children.

I am pleased matters seemed to have worked out, for your Pakistani subordinate. Indeed, I am especially gratified to learn his wife did not sacrifice years of education and training, to a sexist tradition.

"I really love those two sentences. Your husband is a lucky man. Thank you. I like to think that, we enjoy a symbiotic relationship.

No, I do not "have a Fetlife account".

Messalina

Hi Messalina,

Thank you for your answer
Your story rose a question on my side.
She may cas*trate her husband with that kick and I understood her face was grim because they could not have children anymore.
Bering a muslim woman will be harder for her to accept having children with another man.

But assuming a couple have children already, would you consider a wife being OK to spend her life near a cas*trate man?
There are books underling clear advantages for a cas*trate husband from wife point of view (focusing on important things, no cheating, no domestic violence and so on)
still the sexual relation / satisfaction for the woman can remain a problem
do she need another man to satisfy her?

When I was a kid I read 1001 Arabian nights books. There it was a clear distinction between an eunuch and a man/bull and any heroine in those stories needed both

How are you seeing this?

Sebastian

[Messalina]

Hi Messalina,

Thank you for your answer
Your story rose a question on my side.
She may cas*trate her husband with that kick and I understood her face was grim because they could not have children anymore.
Bering a muslim woman will be harder for her to accept having children with another man.


But assuming a couple have children already, would you consider a wife being OK to spend her life near a cas*trate man?
There are books underling clear advantages for a cas*trate husband from wife point of view (focusing on important things, no cheating, no domestic violence and so on)
still the sexual relation / satisfaction for the woman can remain a problem
do she need another man to satisfy her?

When I was a kid I read 1001 Arabian nights books. There it was a clear distinction between an eunuch and a man/bull and any heroine in those stories needed both

How are you seeing this?

Sebastian

Hello Sebi40,


How are you? I hope you and yours are keeping safe in these scary times. You are most welcome re; my response to your message.

The lady in question did not emasculate her husband. In a male human, (as you are aware) the gonads (testes) are external. This places them at greater risk for injury than, their female counterparts the ovaries which, are internally placed. Specifically, the sperm ducts (which carry the sperm manufactured in the testicles to the prostate and beyond) are fragile. They can easily be damaged, sometimes significantly enough to impede impregnation. A blow that causes swelling or scar tissue to form in the testes, can achieve this unfortunate result. This is what happened to the former colleague, I referenced in my message. His wife (my friend) did not destroy or otherwise render his testicles non viable.

There maybe a language issue here. Perhaps, you are communicating something, you do not intend to? In any event; my friend made it clear to me that, she has no intention of becoming an adulteress. That is, she will NOT be "having children with another man.".

"But assuming a couple have children already, would you consider a wife being OK to spend her life near a cas*trate man?" In a previous message you seemed to suggest, a Pakistani staffer of yours had an antiquated view of women and marriage. Forgive me, but you 'seem' to have one as well. I know a number of married couples (some intimately) in which, the man is unable to sire children. Granted, I am acquainted with far more couples where, it is the woman unable to have children. In both circumstances, the couples have fashioned happy and fulfilling lives together. So, I reject your initial insinuation that, a woman could not be happy with a husband who, could not give her children. To answer your question directly; it depends on the woman. Some wives want children very much. If a man who is unable to impregnate such a wife and will not consider alternatives then, the couple should go their separate ways, in my opinion.

Yes, I know a few married couples in which, the male partner is a gelding. That is, he lost his 'precious plums' to illness or injury. Some have 'little people', some do not. I can not speak with absolute certainty, as to the 'quality' of a relationship. No one on the outside of a marriage, really knows what is going on inside one. However (to me), seems many of these women meant what they said re; "For richer or poorer, In sickness and in health, For better or worse".

Personally, I question your reading material. This maybe difficult for you to accept, but there are plenty of marriages in which; there is "no cheating, no domestic violence, and so on" by the husband. It is absurd to think that, one needs to mutilate the person one professes to love, in order to prevent any of that! A man that genuinely loves his wife will not do any of this. If he has an emotional / psychological problem, he will seek professional 'help'. To wit; I was once close to a woman who's husband had / has an attraction to men. Unfortunately, they are wealthy socialites residing in a rather oppressive society. The husband loved his wife enough to submit to some rather cruel (and in my opinion barbaric) treatments to 'cure' his homosexuality. Or at least, bisexuality.

For a healthy male human; the disadvantages FAR outweigh any supposed "advantages". The loss of the major source of testosterone (testicles) has a catastrophic effect on the male body. Also, there can be devastating emotional / psychological consequences.

"still the sexual relation / satisfaction for the woman can remain a problem do she need another man to satisfy her?" I have NO doubt you are male.<chuckle> Seems, so easy for men to separate the emotional and the carnal. Both women and marriages are complex things. Inherent, in a sexual attraction for many women is an emotional one. In order to be physically attracted to a man, we must like 'something' about him. Men do not seem to have this as, a prerequisite.lol Also, in terms of your question... a woman's value system plays an important role. It is difficult for many to break their marital vows. Even when, many feel there is good (or at least sufficient) reason to do so. Such as a philandering spouse. Also, it depends on the kind of physical intimacy a women needs. Many women can be satisfied with cunnilingus. Put another way; some 70% of women do not achieve orgasm through penetrative sex alone. On the other hand, there are women who are attracted to and enjoy sex with gelded men! However, even for many of these ladies the lads need to be able to achieve erections. This means being on some form of Testosterone Replacement Therapy(TRT).

So that, you know I speak with some 'authority'; I am unable to have children. My husband married me anyway.<chuckle> Something unfortunate happened to me many years ago. Hubby basically received 'damaged goods'. Judging by the inference in your question "would you consider a wife being OK to spend her life near a cas*trate man?" seems, likely you might see me as 'tainted'. Fortunately, hubby is more progressive in that regard.

"When I was a kid I read 1001 Arabian nights books. There it was a clear distinction between an eunuch and a man/bull and any heroine in those stories needed both

How are you seeing this?" Personally, I feel you need to update your reading.<chuckle> Preferably, starting with non fiction. You might even consider reading a book or two written by a woman!lol Perhaps, one written by a woman dealing with a husband afflicted with prostate or testicular cancer? Or maybe, a wife whose spouse suffers from erectile dysfunction or premature ejaculation? Actually (in a way), I have already addressed your last question. That is, when I spoke (typed?) about women's carnality.

Sorry, if I was a bit cheeky. I am functioning on very little sleep.<mia culpa!>

Be careful and safe,


Messalina

[sebi40]

Hello Sebi40,


How are you? I hope you and yours are keeping safe in these scary times. You are most welcome re; my response to your message.

The lady in question did not emasculate her husband. In a male human, (as you are aware) the gonads (testes) are external. This places them at greater risk for injury than, their female counterparts the ovaries which, are internally placed. Specifically, the sperm ducts (which carry the sperm manufactured in the testicles to the prostate and beyond) are fragile. They can easily be damaged, sometimes significantly enough to impede impregnation. A blow that causes swelling or scar tissue to form in the testes, can achieve this unfortunate result. This is what happened to the former colleague, I referenced in my message. His wife (my friend) did not destroy or otherwise render his testicles non viable.

There maybe a language issue here. Perhaps, you are communicating something, you do not intend to? In any event; my friend made it clear to me that, she has no intention of becoming an adulteress. That is, she will NOT be "having children with another man.".

"But assuming a couple have children already, would you consider a wife being OK to spend her life near a cas*trate man?" In a previous message you seemed to suggest, a Pakistani staffer of yours had an antiquated view of women and marriage. Forgive me, but you 'seem' to have one as well. I know a number of married couples (some intimately) in which, the man is unable to sire children. Granted, I am acquainted with far more couples where, it is the woman unable to have children. In both circumstances, the couples have fashioned happy and fulfilling lives together. So, I reject your initial insinuation that, a woman could not be happy with a husband who, could not give her children. To answer your question directly; it depends on the woman. Some wives want children very much. If a man who is unable to impregnate such a wife and will not consider alternatives then, the couple should go their separate ways, in my opinion.

Yes, I know a few married couples in which, the male partner is a gelding. That is, he lost his 'precious plums' to illness or injury. Some have 'little people', some do not. I can not speak with absolute certainty, as to the 'quality' of a relationship. No one on the outside of a marriage, really knows what is going on inside one. However (to me), seems many of these women meant what they said re; "For richer or poorer, In sickness and in health, For better or worse".

Personally, I question your reading material. This maybe difficult for you to accept, but there are plenty of marriages in which; there is "no cheating, no domestic violence, and so on" by the husband. It is absurd to think that, one needs to mutilate the person one professes to love, in order to prevent any of that! A man that genuinely loves his wife will not do any of this. If he has an emotional / psychological problem, he will seek professional 'help'. To wit; I was once close to a woman who's husband had / has an attraction to men. Unfortunately, they are wealthy socialites residing in a rather oppressive society. The husband loved his wife enough to submit to some rather cruel (and in my opinion barbaric) treatments to 'cure' his homosexuality. Or at least, bisexuality.

For a healthy male human; the disadvantages FAR outweigh any supposed "advantages". The loss of the major source of testosterone (testicles) has a catastrophic effect on the male body. Also, there can be devastating emotional / psychological consequences.

"still the sexual relation / satisfaction for the woman can remain a problem do she need another man to satisfy her?" I have NO doubt you are male.<chuckle> Seems, so easy for men to separate the emotional and the carnal. Both women and marriages are complex things. Inherent, in a sexual attraction for many women is an emotional one. In order to be physically attracted to a man, we must like 'something' about him. Men do not seem to have this as, a prerequisite.lol Also, in terms of your question... a woman's value system plays an important role. It is difficult for many to break their marital vows. Even when, many feel there is good (or at least sufficient) reason to do so. Such as a philandering spouse. Also, it depends on the kind of physical intimacy a women needs. Many women can be satisfied with cunnilingus. Put another way; some 70% of women do not achieve orgasm through penetrative sex alone. On the other hand, there are women who are attracted to and enjoy sex with gelded men! However, even for many of these ladies the lads need to be able to achieve erections. This means being on some form of Testosterone Replacement Therapy(TRT).

So that, you know I speak with some 'authority'; I am unable to have children. My husband married me anyway.<chuckle> Something unfortunate happened to me many years ago. Hubby basically received 'damaged goods'. Judging by the inference in your question "would you consider a wife being OK to spend her life near a cas*trate man?" seems, likely you might see me as 'tainted'. Fortunately, hubby is more progressive in that regard.

"When I was a kid I read 1001 Arabian nights books. There it was a clear distinction between an eunuch and a man/bull and any heroine in those stories needed both

How are you seeing this?" Personally, I feel you need to update your reading.<chuckle> Preferably, starting with non fiction. You might even consider reading a book or two written by a woman!lol Perhaps, one written by a woman dealing with a husband afflicted with prostate or testicular cancer? Or maybe, a wife whose spouse suffers from erectile dysfunction or premature ejaculation? Actually (in a way), I have already addressed your last question. That is, when I spoke (typed?) about women's carnality.

Sorry, if I was a bit cheeky. I am functioning on very little sleep.<mia culpa!>

Be careful and safe,


Messalina

Hi Messalina,


Thank you very much for your comprehensive and cheeky answers


I need to underline that I never thought to unfortunate event of testicular cancer.
I was more in line with submissive males and/or dominant females that have this cas*tration fetish.
I also know one couple where he decided to perform cas*tration. They went somewhere and did it as medical procedure after many years of cas*tration and cuckold erotic play as part of BDSM games.
However he lost his lust of playing some time after cas*tration, so their relation was somehow affected.


Than seeing gelding only from pure erotic perspective, having a submissive male and dominate female partner / spouse when both dream for it as a sort of ultimate pleasure, life after can pose some complications.
That was somehow my target toward you because you are female on a ball-busting site, so I just assume you may have this type of fetish.


1001 of Arabian nights it was good from this perspective because there all castrations have that erotic side.
Otherwise of course I have my fears of any diseases including testicular cancer


Again, I really enjoyed your answers


BR and stay safe
Sebastian

[Messalina]

Hi Messalina,


Thank you very much for your comprehensive and cheeky answers


I need to underline that I never thought to unfortunate event of testicular cancer.
I was more in line with submissive males and/or dominant females that have this cas*tration fetish.
I also know one couple where he decided to perform cas*tration. They went somewhere and did it as medical procedure after many years of cas*tration and cuckold erotic play as part of BDSM games.
However he lost his lust of playing some time after cas*tration, so their relation was somehow affected.


Than seeing gelding only from pure erotic perspective, having a submissive male and dominate female partner / spouse when both dream for it as a sort of ultimate pleasure, life after can pose some complications.
That was somehow my target toward you because you are female on a ball-busting site, so I just assume you may have this type of fetish.


1001 of Arabian nights it was good from this perspective because there all castrations have that erotic side.
Otherwise of course I have my fears of any diseases including testicular cancer


Again, I really enjoyed your answers


BR and stay safe
Sebastian

Hello Sebi40,

You are welcome re; my response. Yes, many people think of gelding in the context you mention. The outcome experienced by the couple you referenced does not surprise me. Many people who view orchidectomy thru the prism of a fetish / kink, do not fully consider the real world consequences of their action. Testosterone is in large measure responsible for the male libido. Absent the organs that produce the majority amount of this vital androgen, 98% of men would have no sex drive at all. Also, there can be grave emotional / psychological consequences re; gender identification and mental well-being.

BDSM has never been an interest of mine. I do have a 'fascination-with-ca'stration'. In the real world, it is in the context of dealing with recidivist sexual predators. Please understand, I am NOT advocating orchidectomies as punishment. Rather, an individual would volunteer for the procedure, as an alternative to prison. The operation would only be authorised after exhaustive psychological examination.

As to the entertainment / kink perspective; I favour the r*ape-revenge sub-genre of exploitation films. Particularly, those movies in which a survivor of r*ape avenges' herself by gelding the man (or men) who, violated her. Ideally, she would ca'strate an assailant during the course of defending herself. I would prefer the scene not be depicted in a gory or 'messy' manner. This kind of thing is erotic to me. However, rarely is a man's life depicted after his gelding. To me, this is even more intriguing! I have only viewed such cinema works or telly programmes once or twice. For what ever it maybe worth; I have never derived pleasure of any kind from so-called "ball-busting". If a woman's life or virtue is not in immediate danger, a strike to the testes is simply a vicious brutal sexual assault. No one would laugh or cheer a scene in which, a man punched or kicked a woman in the breast or crotch.

Somehow, I doubt "1001 of Arabian nights" depicted (or described) ca*stration, in ways I would consider erotic.

It gratifies me, my ramblings are pleasing to you. I would hope, you also found them informative.


Be well and safe,

Messalina

[sebi40]

Hello Sebi40,

You are welcome re; my response. Yes, many people think of gelding in the context you mention. The outcome experienced by the couple you referenced does not surprise me. Many people who view orchidectomy thru the prism of a fetish / kink, do not fully consider the real world consequences of their action. Testosterone is in large measure responsible for the male libido. Absent the organs that produce the majority amount of this vital androgen, 98% of men would have no sex drive at all. Also, there can be grave emotional / psychological consequences re; gender identification and mental well-being.

BDSM has never been an interest of mine. I do have a 'fascination-with-ca'stration'. In the real world, it is in the context of dealing with recidivist sexual predators. Please understand, I am NOT advocating orchidectomies as punishment. Rather, an individual would volunteer for the procedure, as an alternative to prison. The operation would only be authorised after exhaustive psychological examination.

As to the entertainment / kink perspective; I favour the r*ape-revenge sub-genre of exploitation films. Particularly, those movies in which a survivor of r*ape avenges' herself by gelding the man (or men) who, violated her. Ideally, she would ca'strate an assailant during the course of defending herself. I would prefer the scene not be depicted in a gory or 'messy' manner. This kind of thing is erotic to me. However, rarely is a man's life depicted after his gelding. To me, this is even more intriguing! I have only viewed such cinema works or telly programmes once or twice. For what ever it maybe worth; I have never derived pleasure of any kind from so-called "ball-busting". If a woman's life or virtue is not in immediate danger, a strike to the testes is simply a vicious brutal sexual assault. No one would laugh or cheer a scene in which, a man punched or kicked a woman in the breast or crotch.

Somehow, I doubt "1001 of Arabian nights" depicted (or described) ca*stration, in ways I would consider erotic.

It gratifies me, my ramblings are pleasing to you. I would hope, you also found them informative.


Be well and safe,

Messalina

Dear Messalina

I see that you are trying to fit your fetish in politically correct area
You are focus on sexual offenders and yes it is a general debate if those should be gelded in exchange for prison.
Also even if you are considering yourself not interested in BDSM, you are trying to follow BDSM SSC rules: Safe, Sane & Consensual
You are not considering to cas*trate a sexual offender without his consent(Consensual), using a medical facility(Safe) and having a psychological check on the guy(Sane).

Regarding R*ape followed by Revenge movies I also saw some of them but not as much interested because those movies do not follow any of SSC rules.

I am interested in erotic fight as you describe playing with your husband. I did this in various occasions (erotic fight workshops) but in this type of fight it is fair for a female to target male genitals, otherwise won´t be fair since a male is generally stronger than a female. Again SSC rules are in place.

General dirty fight even if not Consensual it is something I enjoy. I have a separate thread for this. In this case I enjoy any inflicted pain in erogenous zones to both female or male.
This not a politically correct fetish I have to admit but when I was a kid a girl kicked me in the balls and win a fight, also later I found females excited about receiving slaps or kicks in te pussy so yes doing this on the street it is clear not OK but doing it in private you can move along (like the fight with your husband)

All the best in 2021

Sebastian

[Messalina]

Dear Messalina

I see that you are trying to fit your fetish in politically correct area
You are focus on sexual offenders and yes it is a general debate if those should be gelded in exchange for prison.
Also even if you are considering yourself not interested in BDSM, you are trying to follow BDSM SSC rules: Safe, Sane & Consensual
You are not considering to cas*trate a sexual offender without his consent(Consensual), using a medical facility(Safe) and having a psychological check on the guy(Sane).

Regarding R*ape followed by Revenge movies I also saw some of them but not as much interested because those movies do not follow any of SSC rules.

I am interested in erotic fight as you describe playing with your husband. I did this in various occasions (erotic fight workshops) but in this type of fight it is fair for a female to target male genitals, otherwise won´t be fair since a male is generally stronger than a female. Again SSC rules are in place.

General dirty fight even if not Consensual it is something I enjoy. I have a separate thread for this. In this case I enjoy any inflicted pain in erogenous zones to both female or male.
This not a politically correct fetish I have to admit but when I was a kid a girl kicked me in the balls and win a fight, also later I found females excited about receiving slaps or kicks in te pussy so yes doing this on the street it is clear not OK but doing it in private you can move along (like the fight with your husband)

All the best in 2021

Sebastian

Hello Sebi40,

If you wish to view my interests or kinks (as they relate to cas'tration), through the prism of BDSM, so be it. I do not hold that perspective, as I do not engage in emasculation. That is, I am not attempting to place my "fetish in politically correct area.". In my opinion, there is nothing "politically correct" re; emasculation. Basically, I am advocating the infliction of one atrocity, to stop (or at least limit), the commission of another atrocity. That is, both gelding and r'ape, are acts of barbarism.

"Regarding R*ape followed by Revenge movies I also saw some of them but as not much interested because those movies do not follow any of SSC rules." Thank you! You have made the point, I was making in my previous para. My fondness for these films, proves I am NOT interested in being 'politically correct'. Frankly, (in real life) I do not have a problem with a woman emasculating an assailant, in the course of defending herself. I am not stating, a woman should have it in her mind that, should she ever be attacked, she would look to ca'strate her attacker. For what ever it maybe worth; (in my opinion), a strike to the testicles should ONLY be done in a life or death situation. Certainly, if her virtue is in immediate jeopardy!

"I did this in various occasions (erotic fight workshops) but in this type of fight it is fair for a female to target male genitals, otherwise won't be fair since a male is generally stronger than a female. Again SSC rules are in place." What happens between my husband and I, has nothing to do with 'what', you seem to be stating. Firstly, with the husband and myself it is not "fightinging". Secondly, I would NEVER EVER "target male genitals' in relation to my husband! In regard to our 'erotic struggling', it is not supposed to be "fair". I do not want to 'win'. The whole point is "a male is generally stronger than a female."! We do the faux struggling because, I enjoy being 'taken' and compelled to submit, to his masculine strength and or charms. Please, consider rereading my initial posting, mentioning this. Once again, your commentary seems to prove two things. Firstly, I do not really share your fetish. Secondly, you 'seem' to view matters solely through the submissive male / dominant female prism, you mentioned in a previous message.

The comments in your last paragraph, confirmed something I suspected. That being, a youthful experience imprinted this in your psyche. Your interest / pleasure derives from this. I accept this is something which, gives you enjoyment. We have all have our own interests, kinks, and or fetishes. I simply ask that, you cease trying to project yours onto my marital activities, with my husband.


A prosperous (and safe!) New Year to you,

Messalina

[prenex]

Hello Sebi40,
... The comments in your last paragraph, confirmed something I suspected. That being, a youthful experience imprinted this in your psyche. Your interest / pleasure derives from this. ...

Messalina

hm, dear Messalina, for Sebi40 it's a simple explanation. But I'm wondering why I have ballbusting fetish, when I have no similar experience from childhood. Absolutely nothing.
Girl me never kicked in the balls. (At my schools not exist any ballbusting practices...) I saw only in TV some kicks, but it was never interesting for me.

I only got this fetish on the internet. Approximately 12 years back I found this page. (I was looking various sexual pages.) And at first I was surprised. I started reading this forum -
nice real experiences, pictures, interesting stories... And I see - I am very sexually aroused - horny, my heart beats fast... - I perceive for the first time - When the girl kicks a boy in the balls, It is so sexy... beautiful...





And also I love when women talk about male balls, ballbusting. Castra-tion is not my fetish, but if a woman talk also in this theme, it is also interesting

[papaschlumpf]

I won't let go until you make me Cum. Twice. PREVIEW
https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.p...h5f007de329c14

[papaschlumpf]

Do not Masturbare without my Permission (Intense Squeeze)
https://de.pornhub.com/view_video.ph...h5fa3951b968b3

[Gadeto]

Really nice links! Thanks very much

[papaschlumpf]

Really nice links! Thanks very much

You're welcome.

[papaschlumpf]

Belle Delphine
https://www.reddit.com/r/BallBusting...elle_delphine/

If the gif doesn't move, click o the image to open it in a new tab, right-click on the image and activate the loop feature.